Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fallowfield, L J
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fallowfield, L J
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 47:388-399 (1991)
© 1991 The British Council


research-article

Psychosocial and sexual impact of diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer

L J Fallowfield and A Hall

Cancer Research Campaign, Clinical Trials Centre, King's College Hospital School of Medicine and Denistry, Rayne Institute London, UK

Abstract

Psychosocial and sexual disturbances are common sequelae to a diagnosis of breast cancer and its treatment. The intuitively plausible hope that the advent of breast conserving techniques would prevent the psychological distress experienced following mastectomy has not been realised. Studies comparing psychosocial outcome of mastectomy with lumpectomy and radiotherapy reveal some advantage to women treated with breast conserving procedures in terms of body image, but very little difference in terms of psychiatric morbidity or sexual dysfunction. Whatever the pimary therapy, women must still confront the act that they have had cancer, a life-threatening disease which may recur. In this chapter the research comparing psychological outcome between mastectomy and lumpectomy is critically reviewed and the implications that these data have for clinical practice are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.