Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Churchill, D R
Right arrow Articles by McAdam, K P W J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Churchill, D R
Right arrow Articles by McAdam, K P W J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 49:465-474 (1993)
© 1993 The British Council


research-article

Screening the returned traveller

D R Churchill, P L Chiodini and K P W J McAdam

The Hospital for Tropical Diseases London, UK
Department of Clinical Sciences, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London, UK

Abstract

Large numbers of people return to the UK each year (estimated at 2 million in 1990) from tropical areas where they may have been exposed to a variety of tropical infections. Some will seek medical help because of specific symptoms, whilst others who are asymptomatic will request screening investigations to reveal latent infections which might give rise to symptoms later in life. A third group will ask for help with retrospective diagnosis of illnesses suffered whilst abroad. People from all three groups may express concern about the risk of passing on infections to close contacts or may be worried about their fitness to return to the tropics.

The precise value of screening for tropical illness is hard to quantify, as the chance of finding an important treatable illness in any one individual will depend on the level of risk of infection to which that individual has been exposed. In some groups of travellers such as refugees, screening is clearly worthwhile, whilst in others whose risk of serious infection is low, the benefit is likely to be small. Nevertheless a demand for screening after tropical travel exists, and it is important to be aware of how to investigate for asymptomatic disease in returned travellers who request screening.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.