Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maynard, A
Right arrow Articles by Godfrey, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maynard, A
Right arrow Articles by Godfrey, C
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 50:221-230 (1994)
© 1994 The British Council

research-article

Alcohol policy — Evaluating the options

A Maynard and C Godfrey

Centre for Health Economics, University of York York, UK

Abstract

All policy interventions have costs and benefits and the ‘harm’ created by the use of alcohol can only be mitigated at a cost. The purpose of economic analysis is to measure these costs and benefits in an explicit way and to use these results to inform policy. Policy makers like to use estimates of the social costs of alcohol use but such data are of little use in identifying which interventions reduce harm at least cost: knowing alcohol use costs in local currencies $6 billion in Australia, $5.8 billion in the USA, $5.7 billion in Canada and $2 billion in the UK may fuel political debate but does not identify the intervention where investment produces the greatest increase in benefit at least cost. Integrated policies to raise taxes in relation to price and income changes have significant impacts on alcohol consumption and, if complemented with advertising controls and limits on availability have even larger effects. The quantity and quality of economic evaluations of health care interventions is inadequate. What little evaluation that has been undertaken indicates that low cost minimal interventions may be cost effective for the wider population of problem drinkers. Other more intensive interventions are likely to be cost effective only if well targeted on appropriate client groups. There are many effective ways of reducing alcohol consumption. The industry will lose and oppose change but improvements in health and other aspects of life (eg civil order) will be significant.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
S. Coulton, C. Drummond, D. James, C. Godfrey, J M. Bland, S. Parrott, T. Peters, and the Stepwice Research Team
Opportunistic screening for alcohol use disorders in primary care: comparative study
BMJ, March 4, 2006; 332(7540): 511 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
D Malone and T Friedman
Drunken patients in the general hospital: their care and management
Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2005; 81(953): 161 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
L. M. Gentilello, D. M. Donovan, C. W. Dunn, and F. P. Rivara
Alcohol Interventions in Trauma Centers: Current Practice and Future Directions
JAMA, October 4, 1995; 274(13): 1043 - 1048.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.