Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newton, J A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newton, J A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 50:677-687 (1994)
© 1994 The British Council


research-article

Genetics of melanoma

J A Newton

ICRF Skin Tumour Laboratory, Royal London Hospital Whitechapel, London, UK

Abstract

Melanoma may cluster in families with "family cancer syndromes" in which there is a predisposition to a variety of different tumours. Other families seem vulnerable to melanoma alone. In the majority of these families, the propensity to melanoma is associated with the presence of abnormal melanocytic naevi, the so-called atypical mole syndrome (AMS) phenotype. However, in a smaller number of families, individuals are susceptible to melanoma but have normal naevi. There appears, therefore, to be clinical (and probably genetic) heterogeneity.

Segregation analysis does not support a predisposition by single dominant gene as an explanation for the AMS/melanoma syndrome. To date, a single gene which is clearly important for susceptibility to melanoma has not been identified.

Karyotypic studies of melanoma tumours have pointed to chromosomes 1,6,7,9 and 10 as possible sites for melanoma related genes. Loss of heterozygosity studies have suggested that chromosome 9 may carry a tumour suppressor gene important in familial disease, and linkage studies appear to confirm this. It is not yet clear, however, what percentage of familial melanoma is attributable to this gene. A more longstanding suggestion that a gene on chromosome 1 may be important has not been confirmed, but a chromosome/gene may be responsible for susceptibility in a small subset of melanoma families.

Even within AMS families, there is a lack of concordance between the AMS phenotype and susceptibility to melanoma. This might be explained either by the effects of modifying genes, or the environment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. M. Stahl, M. Cheung, A. Sharma, N. R. Trivedi, S. Shanmugam, and G. P. Robertson
Loss of PTEN Promotes Tumor Development in Malignant Melanoma
Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 63(11): 2881 - 2890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. P. Robertson, R. A. Herbst, M. Nagane, H-J. S. Huang, and W. K. Cavenee
The Chromosome 10 Monosomy Common in Human Melanomas Results from the Loss of Two Separate Tumor Suppressor Loci
Cancer Res., August 1, 1999; 59(15): 3596 - 3601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.