Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ham, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ham, C
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 51:819-830 (1995)
© 1995 The British Council

research-article

Synthesis; what can we learn from international experience?

C Ham

Professor of Health Policy and Management and Director, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2RT, UK

Abstract

International experience shows that rationing can occur through exclusions or through the use of guidelines. Oregon has chosen to ration by excluding certain services in order to move towards universal population coverage. New Zealand has avoided exclusions and has chosen to ration through the use of guidelines. The Netherlands is pursuing both approaches. The experience of these and other countries demonstrates that rationing is inherently difficult. Choices in health care can be informed by techniques drawn from economics and other disciplines but these techniques need to be used as part of debate and discussion in the process of arriving at decisions. Experts and the public can contribute to this process and strenuous efforts need to be made to ensure participation by a representative cross-section of the population. At its root priority setting is a political process shaped by beliefs and values. Increased transparency in decision making should promote greater accountability and increased public awareness of the nature of rationing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
M. K. Giacomini
The Which-Hunt:Assembling Health Technologies for Assessment and Rationing
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(4): 715 - 758.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.