Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, D.
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, D.
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 53:253-263 (1997)
© 1997 The British Council


research-article

A review of the economic analysis of obesity

David Hughes and A McGuire

Department of Economics City University, London, UK

Correspondence to: Dr David Hughes, Department of Economics, School of Social Sciences, City University, Northampton Square, London ECIV 0HB, UK

Abstract

There are indications that the treatment costs arising from obesity are significant. However, the cost-of-illness studies undertaken to date also highlight two other important points. First, the cost of treatment is sensitive to the body mass index (BMI) cut-off used. Given that there is no definitive definition of obesity as based on BMI, a range of costs reflecting differing BMI cut-offs may be more appropriate than the use of a single figure. Second, the costs are, not surprisingly, also sensitive to the defined associated diseases. Again there is little agreement on these and also little information on the relative risks of attributable diseases arising from obesity. The calculations of the cost-of-illness arising from the treatment of obesity, and its associated conditions must, therefore, remain indicative rather than authoritative.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
K. Silventoinen, P. Jousilahti, E. Vartiainen, and J. Tuomilehto
Appropriateness of anthropometric obesity indicators in assessment of coronary heart disease risk among Finnish men and women
Scand J Public Health, August 1, 2003; 31(4): 283 - 290.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Gulliford, D Mahabir, B Rocke, S Chinn, and R Rona
Overweight, obesity and skinfold thicknesses of children of African or Indian descent in Trinidad and Tobago
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2001; 30(5): 989 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.