Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, D. R
Right arrow Articles by Li, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, D. R
Right arrow Articles by Li, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 55:856-869 (1999)
© 1999 The British Council

research-article

The biology of fracture healing: optimising outcome

David R Marsh and Gang Li

Trauma Research Group. Musgrave Park Hospital, The Queen's University of Belfast Belfast, UK

Correspondence to Prof David R Marsh, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Musgrave Park Hospital, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT9 7JB, UK

Abstract

Optimising the results of fracture treatment requires a holistic view of both patients and treatment. The nature of the patient determines the priority targets for outcome, which differ widely between the elderly and the young, and between the victims of high and low energy trauma. The efficacy of treatment depends on the overall process of care and rehabilitation as well as the strategy adopted to achieve bone healing.

The rational basis for fracture treatment is the interaction between three elements. (i) the cell biology of bone regeneration, (ii) the revascularisation of devitalised bone and soft tissue adjacent to the fracture; and (iii) the mechanical environment of the fracture

The development of systems for early fracture stabilisation has been an advance. However, narrow thinking centered only on the restoration of mechanical integrity leads to poor strategy - the aim is to optimise the environment for bone healing. Future advances may come from the adjuvant use of molecular stimuli to bone regeneration.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
T. M. Doherty, L. A. Fitzpatrick, D. Inoue, J.-H. Qiao, M. C. Fishbein, R. C. Detrano, P. K. Shah, and T. B. Rajavashisth
Molecular, Endocrine, and Genetic Mechanisms of Arterial Calcification
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2004; 25(4): 629 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. L. Bouxsein, T. J. Turek, C. A. Blake, D. D'Augusta, X. Li, M. Stevens, H. J. Seeherman, and J. M. Wozney
Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Accelerates Healing in a Rabbit Ulnar Osteotomy Model
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2001; 83(8): 1219 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.