Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (78)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, I. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, I. M
Related Collections
Right arrow Neurophysiology
Right arrow Psychiatry
Right arrow Drugs
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 57:161-178 (2001)
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Meta-analytical studies on new antidepressants

Ian M Anderson

Neuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, School of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

A systematic search found 108 meta-analyses of the use of antidepressants in depressive disorders. Defining newer antidepressants as those introduced since the early 1980s, 18 meta-analyses were selected as being informative about their relative efficacy and tolerability in comparative randomised controlled studies (RCTs).

Findings with higher confidence include: little difference in efficacy between most new and old antidepressants; superior efficacy of serotonin and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitors (SNRIs) over selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs); a slower onset of therapeutic action of fluoxetine over other SSRIs; a different side effect profile of SSRIs to TCAs with superior general tolerability of SSRIs over TCAs; poorer tolerability of fluvoxamine than other SSRIs in a within group comparison; no increased the risk of suicidal acts or ideation in fluoxetine compared with TCAs (or placebo) in low-risk patients.

Findings with a lower level of confidence include: greater efficacy of TCAs than SSRIs in in-patients; greater efficacy of amitriptyline than SSRIs; better tolerability of moclobemide than TCAs; no demonstrable difference in tolerability between SSRIs and TCAs in the elderly; no better tolerability of fluvoxamine than TCAs; better tolerability of dothiepin (dosulepin) than SSRIs; better tolerability of sertraline and greater frequency of agitation on fluoxetine than other SSRIs in a within group comparison.

In general, the meta-analyses were of uneven quality, as were the studies included, which limits the confidence in many of the results. Generalising from mostly short-term randomised controlled studies to clinical practice requires caution.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
G. Goodwin and Consensus Group of the British Association for Psy
Evidence-based guidelines for treating bipolar disorder: revised second edition--recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology
J Psychopharmacol, June 1, 2009; 23(4): 346 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
I. Anderson, I. Ferrier, R. Baldwin, P. Cowen, L Howard, G Lewis, K Matthews, R. McAllister-Williams, R. Peveler, J Scott, et al.
Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants: A revision of the 2000 British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines
J Psychopharmacol, June 1, 2008; 22(4): 343 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
M. Olfson, A. K. Das, M. J. Gameroff, D. Pilowsky, A. Feder, R. Gross, R. Lantigua, S. Shea, and M. M. Weissman
Bipolar Depression in a Low-Income Primary Care Clinic
Am J Psychiatry, November 1, 2005; 162(11): 2146 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. A. Hansen, G. Gartlehner, K. N. Lohr, B. N. Gaynes, and T. S. Carey
Efficacy and Safety of Second-Generation Antidepressants in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
Ann Intern Med, September 20, 2005; 143(6): 415 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
B. Arroll, S. Macgillivray, S. Ogston, I. Reid, F. Sullivan, B. Williams, and I. Crombie
Efficacy and Tolerability of Tricyclic Antidepressants and SSRIs Compared With Placebo for Treatment of Depression in Primary Care: A Meta-Analysis
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2005; 3(5): 449 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
L. Trick, N. Stanley, U. Rigney, and I. Hindmarch
A Double-Blind, Randomized, 26-Week Study Comparing the Cognitive and Psychomotor Effects and Efficacy of 75 mg (37.5 mg b.i.d.) Venlafaxine and 75 mg (25 mg Mane, 50 mg Nocte) Dothiepin in Elderly Patients with Moderate Major Depression Being Treated in General Practice
J Psychopharmacol, June 1, 2004; 18(2): 205 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
M. Dwight-Johnson, I. T. Lagomasino, and G. M. Simpson
Psychopharmacology: Underuse of Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapies for Affective Disorders
Psychiatr Serv, August 1, 2003; 54(8): 1076 - 1078.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. Hubbard, P. Farrington, C. Smith, L. Smeeth, and A. Tattersfield
Exposure to Tricyclic and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressants and the Risk of Hip Fracture
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2003; 158(1): 77 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
G. M. Goodwin
Evidence-Based Guidelines for Treating Bipolar Disorder: Recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology
J Psychopharmacol, June 1, 2003; 17(2): 149 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.