Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, C. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, C. J
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Disease
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 59:173-192 (2001)
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Non-surgical treatment of patients with peripheral vascular disease

Christopher J White

Department of Cardiology, Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

Dotter first described percutaneous revascularization of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) in 19641. In 1974, Gruentzig developed a balloon catheter for dilation of vascular lesions2. Currently, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) employs a variety of devices ranging from implantable stents to endovascular radiation devices for re-stenosis and is recognized as a safe and effective alternative to surgery for selected patients.

In addition to the general efficacy of peripheral angioplasty, which is comparable to that of bypass surgery for selected lesions, angioplasty offers several distinct advantages over surgery345. It is performed under local anaesthesia, making it feasible to treat patients who are at high risk for general anaesthesia. When compared to surgical revascularization, the morbidity from angioplasty is low, generally related to problems at the vascular access site, and mortality is extremely rare. Unlike vascular surgery, there is no recovery period after angioplasty, and most patients can return to normal activity within 24–48 h of an uncomplicated procedure. Finally, angioplasty can be repeated if necessary usually without increased difficulty or increased patient risk compared to the first procedure, and does not preclude surgery as adjunctive or definitive therapy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.