| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
British Medical Bulletin 63:223-241 (2002)
© 2002 The British Council
Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use
UCL Centre for Auditory Research, Institute of Laryngology and Otology, London, UK
Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are sounds of cochlear origin, which can be recorded by a microphone fitted into the ear canal. They are caused by the motion of the cochlea's sensory hair cells as they energetically respond to auditory stimulation. OAEs provide a simple, efficient and non-invasive objective indicator of healthy cochlear function and OAE screening is widely used in universal new-born hearing screening programmes. As part of the audiological diagnostic test battery, OAEs can contribute to differential audiological diagnosis, they can be used to monitor the effects of treatment and they can be helpful in the selection of hearing aids and of surgical options. As a research tool, OAEs provide a non-invasive window on intracochlear processes and this has led to new insights into the mechanisms and function of the cochlea and also to a new understanding of the nature of sensory hearing impairment. This chapter provides a broad introduction to OAEs and their applications together with a detailed description of the relationship between OAEs and cochlear mechanisms.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Stuart, A. L. Passmore, D. S. Culbertson, and S. M. Jones Test-Retest Reliability of Low-Level Evoked Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2009; 52(3): 671 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Lee, E. Skoe, N. Kraus, and R. Ashley Selective Subcortical Enhancement of Musical Intervals in Musicians J. Neurosci., May 6, 2009; 29(18): 5832 - 5840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Abel, A. Wittekindt, and M. Kossl Contralateral Acoustic Stimulation Modulates Low-Frequency Biasing of DPOAE: Efferent Influence on Cochlear Amplifier Operating State? J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2009; 101(5): 2362 - 2371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Abel and M. Kossl Sensitive Response to Low-Frequency Cochlear Distortion Products in the Auditory Midbrain J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1560 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Veuillet, A. Magnan, J. Ecalle, H. Thai-Van, and L. Collet Auditory processing disorder in children with reading disabilities: effect of audiovisual training Brain, November 1, 2007; 130(11): 2915 - 2928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Perrot, P. Ryvlin, J. Isnard, M. Guenot, H. Catenoix, C. Fischer, F. Mauguiere, and L. Collet Evidence for Corticofugal Modulation of Peripheral Auditory Activity in Humans Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2006; 16(7): 941 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N S Seixas, S G Kujawa, S Norton, L Sheppard, R Neitzel, and A Slee Predictors of hearing threshold levels and distortion product otoacoustic emissions among noise exposed young adults Occup. Environ. Med., November 1, 2004; 61(11): 899 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





