Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joffe, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joffe, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Environment and Disease
Right arrow Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Right arrow Public Health Medicine
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 68:47-70 (2003)
© The British Council 2003; all rights reserved

Infertility and environmental pollutants

Michael Joffe

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK

Correspondence to: Michael Joffe, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK. E-mail: m.joffe{at}imperial.ac.uk

While it has long been known that female fertility is impaired by oestrogen exposure, it is unclear whether environmental pollutants with weak oestrogenic effects are sufficiently potent and prevalent to have biological effects in humans. Male fertility, or sperm concentration at least, appears to have deteriorated, and there is substantial spatial variation at both national and global level, as well as a genetic component. Sperm morphology and motility are implicated too. There is good evidence for an increase in testicular cancer, and possibly in other conditions that certain spatial characteristics plus evidence on heritability suggest are linked to impaired spermatogenesis. A candidate agent would need to have started increasing in the early 20th century. Weak environmental oestrogens are not responsible. Candidates include agents affecting endogenous maternal oestrogen levels, environmental anti-androgens (although these cannot explain the epidemiological findings), and dioxin and related compounds. Genetic damage should be considered as a unifying hypothesis, possibly focused on the Y-chromosome.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Toxicol SciHome page
A. K. Hotchkiss, C. V. Rider, C. R. Blystone, V. S. Wilson, P. C. Hartig, G. T. Ankley, P. M. Foster, C. L. Gray, and L. E. Gray
Fifteen Years after "Wingspread"--Environmental Endocrine Disrupters and Human and Wildlife Health: Where We are Today and Where We Need to Go
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2008; 105(2): 235 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
M. Joffe, J. Bennett, N. Best, and T. K. Jensen
Sex ratio and time to pregnancy: analysis of four large European population surveys
BMJ, March 10, 2007; 334(7592): 524 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
J.J. Galan, E. Guarducci, F. Nuti, A. Gonzalez, M. Ruiz, A. Ruiz, and C. Krausz
Molecular analysis of estrogen receptor alpha gene AGATA haplotype and SNP12 in European populations: potential protective effect for cryptorchidism and lack of association with male infertility
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 444 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. Olsen, J.P. Bonde, N.H. Hjollund, O. Basso, and E. Ernst
Using infertile patients in epidemiologic studies on subfecundity and embryonal loss
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2005; 11(6): 607 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
E. V. Younglai, A. C. Holloway, and W. G. Foster
Environmental and occupational factors affecting fertility and IVF success
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 43 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br Med BullHome page
D. Briggs
Environmental pollution and the global burden of disease
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2003; 68(1): 1 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.