Skip Navigation


British Medical Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on November 13, 2008
British Medical Bulletin 2009 89(1):111-151; doi:10.1093/bmb/ldn039
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/1/111    most recent
ldn039v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BMB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gougoulias, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Maffulli, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gougoulias, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Maffulli, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sports Medicine
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

History and evolution in total ankle arthroplasty

Nikolaos E. Gougoulias{dagger},{ddagger}, Anil Khanna{dagger},{ddagger} and Nicola Maffulli{dagger}

{dagger} Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Keele University School of Medicine, Thornburrow Drive, Hartshill Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire ST4 7QB, UK
{ddagger} Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital North Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent ST4 7LN, UK

Correspondence to Prof. Nicola Maffulli Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Keele University School of Medicine, Thornburrow Drive, Hartshill, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire ST4 7QB, UK E-mail: osa14{at}keele.ac.uk

Introduction: The current study provides an overview of history and evolution in total ankle arthroplasty.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search without limitations to language. Information from any source, providing evidence of the use ankle of prostheses (e.g. biomechanical testing, cadaveric implantations or clinical use) was evaluated. Data regarding biomechanical concepts, design considerations, published results (patient numbers, surgical method, follow-up, complications and survival rates) were collected.

Results: Only level IV studies were found. Mobile-bearing prostheses are mainly used in Europe, and fixed-bearing implants are mainly used in the USA. The current designs' failure rate is 10–12% at ~5 years. Survival rates vary among different institutions. Increased surgeons' experience is associated with better outcomes.

Discussion: Biomechanical studies and review of previous implant failures has led to the development of a new generation of implants.

Conclusions: Results show that ankle arthroplasty is a viable alternative for the management of ankle arthritis in selected patients.

Keywords: ankle • arthroplasty • replacement • arthritis • joint replacement

Accepted for publication October 15, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in BMB:

Editor's Choice
Norman Vetter
BMB 2009 89: 1-6. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br Med BullHome page
N. Gougoulias, A. Khanna, and N. Maffulli
Sports activities after lower limb osteotomy
Br. Med. Bull., September 1, 2009; 91(1): 111 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.