Skip Navigation


British Medical Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on June 23, 2009
British Medical Bulletin 2009 91(1):7-22; doi:10.1093/bmb/ldp022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/1/7    most recent
ldp022v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in BMB
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shickle, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shickle, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ethics
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The ethics of public health practice: balancing private and public interest within tobacco policy

Darren Shickle*

Academic Unit of Public Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

* Correspondence to: Professor Darren Shickle, Academic Unit of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9LJ, UK. E-mail: d.shickle{at}leeds.ac.uk

Introduction: Public health practice is characterized by measuring population health, assessing needs for health care and the provision (directly or indirectly) of services to protect and promote the public's health. It is increasingly explicitly concerned with issues of equity.

Sources of data: Publications discussing ethical issues in public health.

Areas of agreement: Unlike the duties of clinicians, professional standards for public health practice are not well defined. An ethics framework would help the development and implementation of public health policy.

Areas of controversy: Public health strategies have been criticized for being paternalistic and restrictive of personal choice behaviours or for being too pragmatic, and appearing to endorse illegal activities.

Growing points: Historically public health programmes have been delivered at a population level for large groups of people with varying capacity to benefit. Within more autonomy, consumer-orientated political environment, strategy must be more targeted to facilitate healthy choices as defined by the individual.

Areas timely for developing research: Debate is needed on the aims of public health, rights and responsibilities of professionals and citizens and mechanisms for developing and implementing policy.

Keywords: public health • ethics • public interest • private interest

Accepted for publication May 29, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in BMB:

Editor's Choice
Norman Vetter
BMB 2009 91: 1-6. [Extract] [Full Text]  





Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.