British Medical Bulletin Advance Access first published online on September 11, 2006
This version published online on October 5, 2006
British Medical Bulletin, doi:10.1093/bmb/ldl004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome
1 Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA and
2 The Institute of Human Genetics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK
* Correspondence to: Anna Richards, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8045, St Louis, MO 63110, USA. Tel.: +1 314 3628391; fax: 1 314 3621366; e-mail: anna.richards{at}ncl.ac.uk
The haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) is characterized by the triad of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and acute renal failure. HUS may be classified as either diarrhoeal-associated or non-diarrhoeal/atypical (aHUS). aHUS has recently been shown to be a disease of complement dysregulation, with 50% of cases involving the complement regulatory genes, factor H (CFH), membrane cofactor protein (MCP; CD46), and factor I (IF). However, incomplete penetrance of mutations in each of these genes is reported. This suggests that a precipitating event or trigger is required to unmask the complement regulatory deficiency. The reported precipitating events predominantly cause endothelial injury. Discovery of these mutations has revealed important genotypephenotype correlations. MCP-HUS has a better prognosis and a better outcome after transplantation than either CFH-HUS or IF-HUS.
Keywords: atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) complement factor H (CFH) membrane cofactor protein (MCP; CD46) factor I (IF) renal transplantation thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP)