Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chester, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chester, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Disease
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 59:269-278 (2001)
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Neuromodulation for chronic refractory angina

Roger Moore and Michael Chester

National Refractory Angina Centre, Mersey Regional Cardiothoracic Centre, Liverpool, UK


   Abstract
Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
Introduction
 Trancutaneous electrical nerve...
 Spinal cord stimulation
 General mechanisms of action
 Algorithm
 Conclusions
 References
 
Neuromodulation is the use of therapies which alter the relationship between the heart, its autonomic innervation and the central nervous system with the objective of reducing the ischaemic burden and diminishing the perception of angina.


   Introduction
Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
Trancutaneous electrical nerve...
 Spinal cord stimulation
 General mechanisms of action
 Algorithm
 Conclusions
 References
 
Despite rapid innovations in percutaneous and surgical revascularisation techniques, increasing numbers of refractory angina patients are presenting to cardiologists with advanced coronary disease, which is unsuitable for further revascularisation. Such patients are often severely disabled by chronic angina pectoris, which often correlates poorly with the degree of observable ischaemia. It is with the background of this burgeoning group of patients, ‘refractory’ to revascularisation, that has led to increasing interest in the alternative strategies of neuromodulation.

Neuromodulation owes its origins to Melzack and Wall's gate theory of pain1Go that predicted that stimulation of vibratory afferent nerves would reduce or gate the transmission of pain traffic relaying through the cord at the same point. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)2Go was specifically designed to make use of this predicted effect and was used to treat a variety of pain conditions, before it was shown to be effective in angina. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was also used to good effect in non-cardiac pain conditions before being found to be effective in relieving angina in a patient implanted for cancer pain control.

The UK Pain Society Angina Special Interest Group and the Angina Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain and the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society have endorsed the recommendation of the UK National Refractory Angina Group that neuromodulation should be offered as part of a multidisciplinary angina management programme based on the current guidelines (see <www.angina.org> for details).


   Trancutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Trancutaneous electrical nerve...
Spinal cord stimulation
 General mechanisms of action
 Algorithm
 Conclusions
 References
 
Clinical evidence for TENS treatment in angina

Early studies conducted on limbs compromised by peripheral vascular disease demonstrated improved microcirculatory blood flow as well as a direct analgesic effect3Go. These anti-ischaemic properties provoked interest in the possibility of treating coronary artery insufficiency, which led to Mannhiemer et al4Go producing the first reports of successful application of TENS for chronic angina pectoris in 1982. Several similar small randomised controlled studies5GoGoGo–8Go followed this publication, demonstrating that TENS could improve symptom control, reduce nitrate usage, increase exercise tolerance and extend walking times to ischaemia in chronic angina patients. In common with routine revascularisation strategies, none of the TENS trials attempted to evaluate the placebo effect of the treatment. There have been major difficulties in designing placebo studies because the treatment appears to require paraesthesia for efficacy and so blinding the patient is impossible.

TENS has also been shown to reduce the number of ischaemic episodes in patients presenting to the coronary care ward with unstable angina9Go {Borjesson 1999 5 /id}.

There have been no studies published looking at long-term effects of TENS on prolonged symptom improvement or impact on quality of life in the treatment of chronic angina. Although our own experience of a large series of 150 chronic refractory angina patients indicates significant and sustained improvement is possible in some patients and a randomised controlled study is underway.

TENS application

The electrodes are placed on the chest either side of the maximal area of perceived pain. The electrodes are then connected to the generator and output set at a frequency of 70 Hz and a pulse width of 0.2 ms. The intensity is then increased from zero until the perceived sensation is just less prominent than the patient's typical angina episode5Go.

Patients are advised to activate the TENS device for 1 h, three times per day for background control and also to use it prophylactically during acute angina attacks like GTN. A higher intensity level is required for prophylactic treatment during an acute angina episode with output increased to until the discomfort is relieved. In many patients, the analgesic effect is almost immediate with conversion of the pain to a less noxious sensation, which then gradually subsides. If the pain does not improve within 15 min, or sooner if associated with nausea, vomiting or sweating, patients are advised to attend hospital to exclude an acute coronary event.

Complications

There are few complications in TENS therapy apart from interactions with pacemaker technology. Contact dermatitis is occasionally troublesome and can be avoided by rotating the electrode positions. If it does recur, varying the type of electrode and contact jelly can resolve the problem. In extreme cases a ‘holiday’ with local steroid treatment is helpful.

Safety

TENS therapy is safe in the majority of patients. Permanent cardiac pacemakers are not a contra-indication and problems of abnormal sensing are rare10Go. Any misinterpretation can be avoided by reprogramming the device to a bipolar sensing configuration or altering sensing thresholds11Go.

The TENS electrodes should not be placed directly over the pacemaker can.

There is a single case report of an implanted ventricular defibrillator misconstruing a TENS output as ventricular fibrillation resulting in an inappropriate shock. Care, therefore, must be taken when using TENS therapy in this situation.


   Spinal cord stimulation
Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Trancutaneous electrical nerve...
 Spinal cord stimulation
General mechanisms of action
 Algorithm
 Conclusions
 References
 
Clinical evidence

The first stimulator was implanted for intractable angina in Australia in 198712Go. Subsequently, there has been extensive scrutiny of SCS in ‘refractory’ patients, with over 70 publications to date. SCS has been shown to diminish angina, reduce the frequency of hospital admissions and improve patients' quality of life13GoGoGo–16Go. These improvements appear to be persistent without generating additional risks for the patients.

Spinal cord stimulation was compared to high-risk non-prognostic coronary artery bypass surgery in the ESBY17Go randomized trial. Both groups displayed a significant reduction in angina frequency and short-acting nitrate requirements, whilst only the surgical group showed significant improvement of exercise induced ischaemia at 6 months. However, the surgical arm had a high procedural mortality rate which compared to no deaths in the SCS group.

SCS implantation

Prior to implantation, it is essential that there is a clear understanding between the patient and carer and the medical team about the aims and objectives of therapy. Fear and anxiety are major problems in chronic refractory angina and SCS is not an anxiolytic nor is it implantable psychotherapy.

The device consists of three different components: the implanted pulse generator (IPG), the epidural electrode and a connecting lead. With the awake-patient placed in the prone or sitting position, a Touhy needle is placed in the epidural space using a paramedian approach at the T3–T5 level. Once in position, the electrode is advance to the appropriate level under fluoroscopy guidance (tip at C6–T1). The electrode is connected to an external generator and the final electrode level adjusted with reference to the patient's pattern of stimulatory anaesthesia. Once satisfied that the paraesthesia is pleasant and covers the area of referred pain, the patient is anaesthetized and the IPG is implanted subcutaneously on the anterior abdominal wall. The two units are then connected by a tunnelled lead.

The majority of implanters prefer to complete the entire procedure at one sitting to reduce cost and infection risk (1-stage procedure). If the initial on-table trial is unconvincing, then it is reasonable to externalise the trial lead and implant a few days later if appropriate (2-stage procedure).

Complications

The main risk for patients is infection, which usually requires explantation of the entire system (viz. permanent pacemakers). All procedures are undertaken with sterile technique and covered with prophylactic antibiotics. Because with the percutaneous approach the lead is free within the epidural space, lead displacement is relatively common and requires re-exploration of the epidural electrode. Lead fracture is relatively uncommon.

The most serious potential complication is epidural haemorrhage but is rare (approximately 1:2000), whilst an inadvertent dural tap though usually self-limiting can be quite distressing to the patient and occasionally requires a dural patch.

Safety

Clinicians are naturally concerned over the potential risks of masking myocardial ischaemia. Cardiologists have been apprehensive, fearing that SCS might lead to an increase in the extent of silent ischaemic episodes and also affect the patient's ability to detect an acute coronary event20Go.

Research, however, has established that with SCS the overall ischaemic burden is diminished, myocardial infarction is not disguised21Go and that mortality rates are similar to matched cohorts within the general population of coronary artery disease patients19Go.


   General mechanisms of action
Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Trancutaneous electrical nerve...
 Spinal cord stimulation
 General mechanisms of action
Algorithm
 Conclusions
 References
 
The precise method by which neuromodulation alleviates symptoms and reduces ischaemia has not yet been defined. Several possible mechanisms have been proposed.

Placebo effect

Attempts to explain the clear clinical benefits of neuromodulation in terms of ‘placebo’ versus ‘physiological’ is impossible as both TENS and SCS produce a clearly perceived sensation when activated22Go. Any credible sham device would, therefore, be required to produce a discernible stimulus, which could then be criticized for providing neurostimulation. This creates an irresolvable dilemma.

The placebo effect relates to the psychological influence of a therapeutic agent based on the subject's own belief of the efficacy of the treatment rather than any direct physiological impact of the therapy. The reality is that placebo is a good thing and will influence the outcome from any therapy including angioplasty and bypass surgery. Although its influence is purely psychological, it has also been shown to be capable of eliciting a physiological response. The placebo response has been thought of as a transient phenomenon, but landmark trials in angina have demonstrated that the benefit of placebo can be long lasting23Go,24Go

Gating theory

Melzack and Wall1Go proposed that the stimulation of large diameter type A (proprioceptive) fibres leads to attenuation of transmission from activated small unmyelinated type C fibres from the periphery to the central pain receptors via inhibitory interneurones, at the level of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Therefore, theoretically, either stimulation of peripheral nerves with TENS or stimulation at the level of the dorsal horn with SCS could lead to attenuation of incoming angina signals travelling along sympathetic efferent pathways. Investigation with SCS has revealed a generalized ‘field effect’ with reduced neural activity mediated by alteration in the balance of inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitters. Linderoth et al25Go assayed dorsal horn neurotransmitter levels, demonstrating rises in the inhibitor {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and reduced level of excitatory amino acids (aspartate and glutamate) after SCS in rats. In addition, intrathecal administration of GABA antagonists and adenosine agonists have been shown to increase the effectiveness of SCS in the rat model26Go. This suggests that SCS may act, in part, by up-regulating the natural spinal GABAergic inhibitory interneurones. The GABA system is likely, however, merely to be an example, with the complete pattern of action liable to include the contribution of other messengers and involve their subtle and complex interactions.

Endogenous opioids

It has been proposed that part of the effect of neurostimulation is mediated through heightening of endogenous endorphin activity both at the spinal and cardiac level. Administration of opiates has been shown to be clinically effective in this patient group and SCS has been demonstrated to increase spinal endorphin levels. Mannheimer et al27Go investigated the impact of SCS on cardiac ß-endorphin levels using coronary sinus sampling in patients undergoing right atrial pacing. He established that SCS results in elevated cardiac ß-endorphin levels, but interestingly also showed that the addition of the endorphin antagonist, nalaxone, failed to diminish the benefit of SCS. It is, therefore, not clear as to whether endorphins play a central role in the mechanism of neurostimulation or is just a peripheral phenomenon.

Sympathetic nervous system

Increasing intrinsic cardiac sympathetic activity results in increased myocardial workload and, therefore, elevated oxygen demand. The epicardial and arteriolar coronary vessels are innervated by the sympathetic system, which has a pivotal role in vasomotor control through {alpha}-adrenergic receptors28Go. There are no consistent data on whether the sympathetic system exerts a resting vasoconstrictor tone on the resting coronary circulation, but clear evidence of sympathetic influence during exercise. It is, therefore, evident that any therapy that acts to minimize sympathetic activity will reduce the circumstances likely to potentiate ischaemia in patients with significant coronary artery disease.

In addition to its role in exacerbation of ischaemia, it is also becoming clear that the sympathetic system is also the main conduit in the transmission of angina, from ischaemic myocardium to the central nervous system29Go.

Sympathetic pathways
 The heart has wide-spread sympathetic nerve endings, which coalesce to form the cardiac sympathetic plexus and collateral ganglia. Cardiac nerves link these structures to adjacent swellings within the cervical region of the paravertebral sympathetic ganglion chain30Go. These structures are termed the stellate and middle cervical sympathetic ganglia. The sympathetic pathways connect with the intermediolateral grey column of the upper thoracic spinal cord (T1–T4) through the white and grey rami communicantes. The sympathetic pathway extends upward in the posterolateral brainstem terminating in the hypothalamus.

Studies have revealed that angina reaches consciousness not solely via the hypothalamus but by excitation of the upper thoracic spinothalamic tract, which relay through the ventroposterolateral thalamus and continue upward to the higher brain centres31Go, although no anatomical relationship between the sympathetic pathway and the STT has been demonstrated.

The sympathetic/parasympathetic balance has been investigated by Hautvast et al32Go who failed to show any alteration in heart rate variability with SCS. However, Meglio et al33Go did find a decrease in resting heart rate and features suggestive of a functional sympathectomy in 25 patients with stimulators, and several investigators have demonstrated a small fall in systolic blood pressure during neurostimulation with both TENS and SCS34Go. Recent work by Foreman et al35Go has cast some light on the mechanism by which neurostimulation may alter cardiac sympathetic drive. They observed that spinal cord stimulation in dogs undergoing coronary artery ligature had a suppressive effect on intrinsic cardiac sympathetic activity. Furthermore, they also discovered that this effect could be neutralised by interrupting the afferent and efferent sympathetic tract in the subclavian ansea. This provides evidence that SCS may act through the influence of spinal cord neurons communicating with the intrinsic cardiac nervous system via intrathoracic cardiac nerves.

Coronary blood flow and myocardial perfusion
 Chauhan et al35Go used intracoronary Doppler wires to analyse the effect of TENS on coronary blood flow in CAD, Syndrome X and cardiac transplant patients. There was an increase in coronary flow at rest in all but the transplanted patients, which implied a sympathetic mediated mechanism. However, Sanderson37Go and Jessurun38Go were unable to verify these results in follow-up studies with Syndrome X and CAD patients, respectively. Likewise, Norsell et al39Go did not see an increase in coronary flow velocity in patients undergoing pacing stress with spinal cord stimulation. The coronary resistance vessels are, however, thought to consist of two resistance compartments in series. The first section consists of {alpha}-adrenergically constrained arterioles and the second section consisting of smaller vessels autoregulated by local metabolic factors. It is, therefore, possible that, whilst sympathectomy may reduce resistance in the first compartment, it may simultaneously, by reducing overall myocardial oxygen demand, increase resistance in the second. As a consequence, there may be no overall alteration in vasomotor tone and, therefore, no increase in coronary blood flow.

The effect of neuromodulation on myocardial perfusion during exercise has been investigated using positron emission tomography (PET)40Go in patients with ischaemic heart disease. The investigators found that although SCS failed to alter the overall blood flow, there was a redistribution of blood to previously ischaemic area producing a more homogeneous pattern.


   Algorithm
Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Trancutaneous electrical nerve...
 Spinal cord stimulation
 General mechanisms of action
 Algorithm
Conclusions
 References
 
It is important to realize that, for the majority of patients, neuromodulation will lessen the intensity of their chest pain and reduce the frequency of attacks rather than completely eradicate symptoms. We have, therefore, found it necessary in our own department to provide the patient with education, counselling, help with relaxation and cognitive behaviour therapy as part of an integrated care algorithm41Go. This pathway is commenced prior to neurostimulation in order for the patients to gain maximum benefit from TENS and SCS. It provides an opportunity to re-assure, change life-style patterns, such as minimal physical activity, and gain agreement with patients to realistic treatment goals.


   Conclusions
Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Trancutaneous electrical nerve...
 Spinal cord stimulation
 General mechanisms of action
 Algorithm
 Conclusions
References
 
Neuromodulation has been shown to improve anginal symptoms and reduce ischaemia without placing the patient at significant risk. The exact mechanism of action remains unclear, but is likely to be a complex interaction involving placebo effect, nociceptive gating and cardiac sympathetic modulation.


   Footnotes
Top
 Footnotes
Abstract
 Introduction
 Trancutaneous electrical nerve...
 Spinal cord stimulation
 General mechanisms of action
 Algorithm
 Conclusions
 References
 
Correspondence to: Dr M R Chester, Director, National Refractory Angina Centre, Mersey Regional Cardiothoracic Centre, Thomas Drive, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK


   References
Top
 Footnotes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Trancutaneous electrical nerve...
 Spinal cord stimulation
 General mechanisms of action
 Algorithm
 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms. Science 1965; 150: 971–9[Free Full Text]
  2. Hammond C, Murray S, Leach A, Chester R. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of patients with chronic refractory angina. Br J Cardiol 2000; 7: 293–5
  3. Kaada B et al. Vasodilatation induced by of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in peripheral ischaemia. Eur Heart J 1982; 3: 303[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Mannheimer C, Carlsson C-A, Emanuelsson H et al. TENS in severe angina pectoralis. Eur Heart J 1982; 3: 297–302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Mannheimer C, Carlsson C-A, Emanuelsson H et al. The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with severe angina pectoralis. Circulation 1985; 71: 308–16[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Mannheimer C, Carlsson C-A, Vedin A et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in angina pectoralis. Pain 1986; 26: 291–300[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Kaada B et al. TENS in patients with coronary artery disease Eur Heart J 1990; 2: 447–53
  8. Nitz et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in chronic intractable angina pectoralis. Aust J Physio 1993; 39: 109–13
  9. Borjesson M, Ericsson P, Dellborg M et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in unstable angina pectoris. Coron Artery Dis 1997: 8: 543–50[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Rasmussen M, Hayes D, Vliesra R et al. Can transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation be used safely in patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers? Mayo Clin Proc 1998; 63: 443–5
  11. Chen D, Philip M, Philip P et al. Cardiac pacemaker inhibition by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 27–30{Rasmussen, Hayes et al. 1988 48 /id}[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Murphy DF, Giles KE et al. Dorsal column stimulation for pain relief from intractable angina pectoris. Pain 1987; 28: 365-8
  13. Sanderson JE, Ibrahim B, Waterhouse D et al. Spinal electrical stimulation for intractable angina – long term clinical outcome and safety. Eur Heart J 1994; 15: 810–4[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Sanderson JE, Brooksby P, Waterhouse D et al. Epidural spinal electrical stimulation for severe angina: a study of its effect on symptoms, exercise tolerance and degree of ischaemia. Eur Heart J 1992; 13: 628–33[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Mannheimer C, Augustinsson LE, Carlsson C-A et al. Epidural spinal electrical stimulation in severe angina pectoris. Br Heart J 1988; 59: 56–61[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Dejonste M, Hautvast R, Hillege J et al on behalf of the Working Group on Neurocardiology. Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as adjuvant treatment for intractable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 1529–7
  17. Mannheimer C, Eliasson T, Augustinsson L-E et al. Electrical stimulation versus coronary artery bypass surgery in severe angina pectoris. The ESBY study. Circulation 1998; 97: 1157–63[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Anderson C, Hole P, Oxhøj H. Does pain relief with spinal cord stimulation for angina conceal myocardial infarction? Br Heart J 1994; 71: 419–21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sanderson JE, Ibrahim B, Waterhouse D, Palmer RBG. Spinal electrical stimulation for intractable angina – long term clinical outcome and safety. Eur Heart J 1994; 15: 810–4[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Chandler M, Brennan T, Garrison D et al. A mechanism for of cardiac pain suppression by spinal cord stimulation.: implications for patients with angina pectoris. Eur Heart J 1993; 14: 96–105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Dejonste M, Hautvast R, Hillege J et al. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischaemia during daily life in patients with severe coronary artery disease. A prospective ambulatory electrocardiographic study. Br Heart J 1994; 71: 413–8[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Melzack R, Wall PD. (eds) Textbook of Pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1994: chapter 71
  23. Cobb et al. An evaluation of internal mammary artery ligation by a double blind technique. N Engl J Med 1959; 20: 1115–8
  24. Dimond et al. Evaluation of internal mammary ligation and sham procedure in angina pectoris. Circulation 1958; 18: 712–3
  25. Stiller C, O'Connor W, Brodin E et al. Release of gamma-aminobutyric acid levels in the dorsal horn and suppression of tactile allodynia by spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery 1996; 39: 367–74[Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Meyerson B, Linderoth B et al. Mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain. Neurol Res 2000; 22: 285–92[Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Eliasson T, Mannheimer C, Waagstein F et al. Myocardial turnover of endogenous opioids and CGRP in the human heart and the effects of spinal cord stimulation on pacing induced angina pectoris. Cardiology 1998; 89: 170–7[Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Young M, Vatner S. Regulation of large coronary arteries. Circ Res 1986; 59: 579–96[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Foreman R. Mechanisms of cardiac pain. Annu Rev Physiol 1999; 61: 143–67[Web of Science][Medline]
  30. Janes RD, Brandys C, Hopkins DA, Johnstone DE, Murphy DA, Armour JA. Anatomy of extrinsic cardiac nerves and ganglia. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 299–309[Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Chandler M, Zhang J, Foreman R et al. Cardiopulmonary sympathetic input excites primate cuneothalamic neurons: comparison with spinothalamic tract neurons. J Neurophysiol 1998; 80: 628–37[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hauvast R, Brouwer J, Dejonste M et al. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on heart rate variability and myocardial ischaemia in patients with chronic intractable angina pectoris – a prospective ambulatory electrocardiographic study. Clin Cardiol 1998; 21: 33–8[Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Meglio M, Cioni B, Rossi G et al. Spinal cord stimulation affects the central mechanisms of regulation of heart rate. Appl Neurophysiol 1986; 49: 139–49[Web of Science][Medline]
  34. Emanuelsson H, Mannheimer C, Waagstein F et al. Catecholamine metabolism during pacing induced angina pectoris and the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Am Heart J 1987; 114: 1360–6[Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Foreman B, Linderoth B, Ardell J et al. Modulation of intrinsic cardiac neurons by spinal cord stimulation: implications for its therapeutic use in angina pectoris. Cardiovasc Res 2000; 47: 367–75[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Chaunan et al. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on coronary blood flow Circulation 1994; 89: 694–702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Sanderson J, Woo K, Chung H et al. The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on coronary and systemic haemodynamics in syndrome X. Coron Artery Dis 1996; 7: 547–52[Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Jessurun G, Tio R, Dejonste M et al. Coronary flow dynamics during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for stable angina pectoralis associated with severe narrowing of one coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 921–6[Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Norsell H, Eliasson T, Albertsson P et al. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on coronary blood flow velocity. Coron Artery Dis 1998; 9; 273–8[Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Hauvast R, Blansma P, Dejonste M et al. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on regional myocardial blood flow assessed by positron emission tomography. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 462–7[Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Chester M. Chronic refractory angina: time to sort out a neglected and growing problem. Br J Cardiol 2000; 7: 108–11

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chester, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chester, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Disease
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?