British Medical Bulletin

This Article Abstract FREE Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to citation manager Search for citing articles in: ISI Web of Science (4) Request Permissions Disclaimer Google Scholar Articles by Gitelman, D. R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gitelman, D. R Related Collections Neurology Radiology Social Bookmarking          What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 65:21-34 (2003)
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Attention and its disorders

Imaging in clinical neuroscience

Darren R Gitelman

Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, Departments of Neurology, and Radiology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, and VA Healthcare System Lakeside Division, Chicago, Illinois, USA

	Abstract

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Definition Attentional components Anatomical and behavioural... Disorders of attention Conclusions Key points for clinical... Acknowledgements References

 
This chapter focuses on the clinical aspects of attention including anatomy, cognitive neuropsychology, disorders, and functional imaging evidence for the role of attention in cognition. Particular emphasis is given to selected aspects of visual attention. Imaging studies discussed are primarily functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). In addition, some evidence will be provided from the time-honoured clinical method of lesion studies.

	Introduction

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Definition Attentional components Anatomical and behavioural... Disorders of attention Conclusions Key points for clinical... Acknowledgements References

 
Numerous cognitive processes come into play as one reads this chapter. In fact, it takes little introspection to realize the necessity for visual, language, working memory, and declarative memory (among other) systems in the reading process. Perhaps this chapter will contradict or confirm a cherished scientific belief, thus bringing limbic systems into play. However, the proper operation of all these systems would not be possible without a function that allowed the appropriate selection of stimuli, maintenance of concentration, and interactions with space and time. That cognitive function is attention. Indeed, it could be argued that while most other cognitive systems can operate somewhat independently of one another (e.g. patients with aphasia can still see just as well and patients with pure amnesia can still speak) none of them could function at anywhere near normal levels without the appropriate attentional interactions. Without attention, coherent thought itself would be impossible.

The focus of this chapter will be on the clinical aspects of attention including anatomy, cognitive neuropsychology, disorders, and functional imaging evidence for the role of attention in cognition. However, as the short space allotted to this chapter allows only a brief overview of this domain, the discussion will be focused primarily on selected aspects of visual attention. The interested reader should see the references for additional information. The imaging studies discussed in this chapter primarily fall into the domain of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). In addition, some evidence will be provided from the time-honoured clinical method of lesion studies.

	Definition

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Definition Attentional components Anatomical and behavioural... Disorders of attention Conclusions Key points for clinical... Acknowledgements References

 
Attention has been defined in many ways over the years, yet none of the definitions has improved substantially on the one given by William James in 1890. In his book, The Principles of Psychology, James stated¹:

It [attention] is the taking possession by the mind, in clear and vivid form, of one out of what seem several simultaneously possible objects or trains of thought. Focalization, concentration, of consciousness are of its essence. It implies withdrawal from some things in order to deal effectively with others, and is a condition which has a real opposite in the confused, dazed, scatterbrained state.

In this one paragraph, James provided both a definition of attention and a remarkably prescient description of one type of attentional deficit, that of a confusional state. As James's statement implies, and recent research has demonstrated, attention results in the preferential processing of various types of cognitive information. For example, attentional enhancement can be demonstrated for objects in the environment, for actions, for perception of our own internal states, for thoughts, for space and for time^2–5. The multidimensional nature of attention has led theorists to wonder whether the concept of attention is well-conceived, i.e. whether it refers to a single or clearly definable set of functions^3,6. The approach taken in this chapter is that while attention is not a unitary concept, it does represent a cohesive set of processes, which serve to enhance sensory, motor and cognitive processing.

	Attentional components

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Definition Attentional components Anatomical and behavioural... Disorders of attention Conclusions Key points for clinical... Acknowledgements References

 
Figure 1 presents a schematic for the basic organization and anatomy of attention. Each of these levels will be discussed in turn. Any discussion of attention must first comment on the relationship between attention and arousal since the terms appear so closely related. It seems logical, for example, that an organism with impaired arousal would also have impaired attention. The reverse, however, is not necessarily true as normally alert individuals can show attentional deficits². Furthermore, states of hyperarousal (e.g. pain and fear) may interfere with proper attentional functioning.

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1 Graphical representation of the main psychological and anatomical aspects of attention. In the case of bottom-up attentional competition, other anatomical regions might include those involved with motor planing (e.g. premotor cortex), time intervals or thoughts, though this has not been shown. Adapted from Mesulam2 with permission from Oxford University Press.

 
The core of the arousal system includes the mesencephalic reticular formation and portions of the thalamus (reticular and intralaminar nuclei). Together, these regions comprise one part of the ascending reticular activating system (ARAS). The other components of this system of a series of brainstem (substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area, raphe nuclei, and locus coeruleus) and basal forebrain nuclei². Activity in the ARAS results in a wakeful state, desynchronizes the electroencephalogram, and modulates neuronal responsivity⁷. Changes in the state of arousal will thus clearly influence cortical and subcortical areas involved with attention. The opposite relationship is also true and changes in the attentional state of an organism can influence the activity in the ARAS. For example, Kinomura and colleagues demonstrated the influence of attention on ARAS activity by using PET to compare regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) when subjects were awake but resting versus when they were engaged in attentionally demanding tasks. During the state of high attention, rCBF increased markedly in the mesencephalic tegmentum and the intralaminar nuclei of the thalamus (among other regions) confirming the hypothesized influence⁸. Figure 2 shows the activations in the thalamus and mesencephalic tegmentum.

View larger version (46K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2 Increased rCBF during tasks requiring a high attentional load. On the left, the arrow points to increased rCBF in the intralaminar thalamic nuclei. On the right, the arrow points to activation in the mesencephalic tegmentum. Adapted from Kinomura et al8 with permission from the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

 
In keeping with the multidimensional nature of attention, several different varieties have been identified. This situation is no different than in other cognitive domains. For example, memory processing has been divided into declarative, episodic, implicit, etc subgroups, while in the language domain there are fluent and non-fluent aphasias among other distinctions. The taxonomy of attentional divisions has tended to be confusing, however, as it has often depended on what is being attended to. For example, the term selective attention can refer to the selection of objects, their attributes, or a portion of space.

Selective attention is one of the most studied aspects of attention and is the aspect of attention most often referred to when discussing the brain's limited processing capacity and the need to select particular targets among multiple stimulus streams. What exactly an organism is selecting will depend on the task being performed. Selection can encompass many domains, and evidence has accumulated for both object and space based attentional selections^9,10. Divided attention involves monitoring of several stimuli at once. Vigilance refers to the sustained aspects of attention. Vigilant behaviour can include both sustaining attention to a particular stimulus over time or to the detection of and response to any unpredictable or rare event^11,12. Finally, the controlled aspects of attention refer to behaviour in which attention to one activity is stopped so that attention can be directed to another stimulus.

	Anatomical and behavioural models

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Definition Attentional components Anatomical and behavioural... Disorders of attention Conclusions Key points for clinical... Acknowledgements References

 
One set of cognitive models has postulated that various aspects of attention act in a top-down manner to bias preferentially the processing of stimuli. As illustrated in Figure 1, top-down refers to the influences of heteromodal (posterior parietal and prefrontal) and limbic cortical areas on unimodal visual, auditory and somatosensory cortices in order to modulate the processing of stimuli based on the cognitive and motivational preferences of the organism². Top-down models of attention have also been conceived as a type of mental spotlight, which enhances processing of the illuminated (i.e. selected) item^13,14. Two main anatomical models have emerged for this organization of attention. Although the model developed by Mesulam comes from a more anatomical viewpoint, and that of Posner stresses the particular psychological operations involved, both models bear a remarkable similarity in the hypothesized brain regions and cognitive processes (Fig. 3).

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3 Anatomical models for top-down attentional control. (A) Model adapted from Mesulam16 with permission from Wiley. (B) Model adapted from Posner and colleagues5 with permission from MIT Press.

 
Mesulam's model is characterized by each of the main cortical regions containing a high-level abstract map of the world: a sensory-representational map in the parietal cortex, a motor-exploratory-map in the premotor cortex/frontal eye fields, and a limbic-motivational map in the cingulate cortex and possibly insula. This anatomical organization was based primarily on tract tracing studies in primates and behavioural studies of patients with neglect (see Mesulam^15,16 for references).

The model proposed by Posner and colleagues focuses on the cognitive operations performed by each of the regions. Thus, the posterior attentional network is responsible for moving the focus of attention. This operation includes disengaging attention from its current target (controlled by the parietal cortex), moving attention to a new target (controlled by the superior colliculus) and engaging attention at the new target (controlled by the pulvinar). The anterior attentional network is involved with detecting salient events and preparing motor responses. Finally, the vigilance network is in charge of sustaining attention and maintaining a state of alertness¹⁷.

Both Mesulam's and Posner's models were initially intended to explain the spatial aspects of attention and not the interaction of attention with particular object features. In his 1981 article, Mesulam himself noted that his theory did not account for all aspects of attention¹⁵. In addition, only Mesulam's model comments on how neuronal responses might be affected by attention¹⁵.

Despite these shortcomings of these models, both accurately characterise the cortical and subcortical brain regions associated with top-down attentional behaviours. Numerous functional imaging studies have confirmed and re-confirmed the involvement of these top-down areas (posterior parietal, frontal eye field and cingulate/supplementary motor cortices) in various aspects of attention. Tasks producing activations in these regions include sustaining attention¹⁸, shifting attention covertly (without eye movements)^19–22, shifting attention overtly (with eye movements)^23,24, and motivational biasing of attentional behaviour²⁵. Figure 4 illustrates the anatomy of regions putatively involved with the top-down aspects of attention. Note that activation of the temporo-occipital junction (TOJ) is likely to reflect top-down influences on the visual system, rather than being part of the top-down system per se.

View larger version (63K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4 Regions activated by covert shifts of spatial attention. Images were acquired using fMRI. Activated regions are significant at P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons. The group performing this task ranged in age from 24–80 years demonstrating that these activations are seen consistently across the adult ageing spectrum. Key: INS, insula; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; FEF, frontal eye fields; TOJ, temporo-occipital junction (probably includes region MT+); TPJ, temporo-parietal junction.

 
Recent attentional models have begun to incorporate the concept of bottom-up competition among stimuli (actually their neuronal representations) to explain the effects of various target types on attention, the dynamic interaction between perception and attention, and the fine focus of the attention spotlight²⁶. A ‘biased competition’ model suggests that competition occurs at the level of the sensory association cortices among neurons representing different objects or locations in the environment. A further modulatory signal is provided by the top-down attentional cortical centres, which provide feedback to the visual regions. Competitive interactions take place across the stimulus environment in a parallel manner. Attention thus emerges as a combination of feed-forward signals from the visual cortices (bottom-up) and feed-back signals from the parieto-frontal-limbic network (top-down). The combined interactions are thought to bias positively neurons representing the attended target(s) to ‘prevail’ in their interactions. Presumably, similar competitive interactions occur in other sensory cortices. In addition, neurons representing unattended stimuli are thought to be suppressed in their responses^26,27.

The principles of top-down and bottom-up interactions are demonstrated in Figure 5, which is taken from the article by Kastner and Ungerleider²⁸. The figure demonstrates that in the absence of attention, a visual stimulus is still able to activate visual association cortex (Fig. 5A). In the presence of attention, activation is greater at sites such as V4, which are connected with up-stream (top-down) cortical areas (Fig. 5B). When visual stimulation is removed, attention still affects the baseline activity in visual association cortex (Fig. 5C). Thus, it appears that attention can modulate baseline neural activity in order to prepare a specialized region for processing some type of anticipated stimulus. Attention further modulates the response of a region when the appropriate stimulus appears²⁹.

View larger version (73K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5 Visual cortex activation during various states of attention and visual stimulation. (A) Activations during the presentation of a right peripheral visual stimulus while the subject's attention was engaged in another task. (B) Significantly larger activation in V4 compared with (A), when the subject attended to the visual stimulus. (C) Attending to the location of an expected but not visible visual stimulus also activated V4. Laterality is indicted by R (right) in (A). Adapted from figure 3 of Kastner and Ungerleider28 with permission from Elsevier.

 
The concepts underlying the biased competition model are also important because they illustrate that attentional interactions can take place potentially at all levels of sensory processing. These multilevel attentional concepts have been incorporated into many current theories of attention^2,29.

	Disorders of attention

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Definition Attentional components Anatomical and behavioural... Disorders of attention Conclusions Key points for clinical... Acknowledgements References

 
Given the importance of attention to sensory and cognitive processing, it is not surprising that attentional disorders are among the most common and most devastating neurological conditions. The main attentional disorders are confusional states, partial (domain-specific) attentional syndromes, and hemispatial neglect.

Confusional states

A confusional state (or delirium) is a global change in mental status wherein the principal cognitive deficit is a change in the overall attentional tone. It is the most common disturbance of mental status seen by physicians. Associated symptoms can include incoherent thinking, distractibility, perceptual disturbances including illusions or hallucinations, dyscoordination, delusions, impaired judgement, reduced insight and agitation. Some of these disturbances may arise because of the attentional disorder while others may arise separately².

Patients in a confusional state are usually disoriented and their memory is impaired. They may appear to have mild-to-moderate associated cognitive deficits such as an anomia, dysgraphia, dyscalculia, or constructional difficulties². The attentional nature of these disturbances may become apparent if the patient is given additional assistance in a task. For example, extra-encoding trials on memory tests may allow the patient with a mild confusional state to overcome partially the apparent amnestic disturbance.

Despite wide-spread cognitive disturbances, patients usually have no lateralizing neurological signs and primary motor and sensory functions are generally intact. When neurological signs occur, they may include a coarse tremor, myoclonus or asterixis as an indicator of the patient's underlying metabolic disarray². Focal neurological signs may be seen, however, when the confusional state arises because of intrinsic central nervous system disease (e.g. stroke).

The main causes of confusional states can be divided into six major classes, which are listed in Table 1. Referring back to Figure 1, a confusional state can involve any of the levels of the attention-arousal system. The actual mechanisms of attentional disruptions include multifocal disorders, strategic focal lesions, or interference with neurotransmitter functions (particularly cholinergic). As listed in Table 1, the focal anatomical regions associated with a confusional state include the parahippocampal-fusiform-lingual gyri in either cerebral hemisphere, and right-sided lesions of the posterior parietal and inferior prefrontal cortex.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1 Main disease classes leading to confusional states

 
There have been few functional imaging studies of patients in a confusional state, probably because of the difficulties examining such patients. In a study of 50 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, six were found to have a delirium based on clinical examination³⁰. These six and another three patients, whose clinical diagnosis was not clear, were found to have perfusion abnormalities by [^99mTc]-HMPAO single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Abnormalities were noted in the left temporoparietal region (5 of 9 patients), right temporoparietal region (4 of 9), frontal cortex on the left (1 of 9) or right (3 of 9), and the right occipital cortex (2 of 9). Five of nine patients had two or more areas of involvement. In a single patient study, a SPECT scan demonstrated right parieto-occipital hypoperfusion in a delirious patient^2,30. These functional imaging studies are consistent with the concept of a network of brain regions contributing to attention. Damage to any part of this network may produce a confusional state, although some regions (e.g. temporoparietal cortex) appear to be more critical than others.

Partial attentional syndromes

Attentional impairments can also present more focally as domain-specific or ‘partial’ attentional syndromes. These syndromes are not well defined because partial attentional impairments tend not to present as separately definable syndromes, rather they are manifest as reduced performance in one or more cognitive domains. For example, changes in visual-based attention could result in reduced detection of stimuli in the environment, while changes in language-based attention could present as reduced verbal fluency. In both these examples, the clinician must be alert to the possibility of an attentional disruption rather than a visual disorder or an aphasia, respectively.

Domain specific attention deficits have been produced in normal individuals using tasks based on the concept of inattentional stimulus processing. Such tasks present subjects with stimuli, which they either attend or ignore. By examining the difference between the attend and ignore conditions, the effects of attention on domain specific processing can be observed. Rees and colleagues, for example, examined domain-specific attentional effects on letter string and picture processing³¹. They found that attention was able to influence, differentially, processing within the visual system for words (left occipital activation) versus pictures (bilateral occipitotemporal activations) even when the words and pictures were both presented simultaneously at fixation. Attention to words also enhanced activations throughout the language system³¹.

Hemispatial neglect

The last attentional disorder to be discussed is hemispatial neglect. This disorder, one of the most clinically dramatic in neurology, is characterized by the inability of the patient to orient towards, respond to, or report on, stimuli on the contralesional side of space³². Neglect is a multimodal deficit and may affect any or all sensory modalities, motor behaviours or even the internal representations of memories and other thoughts. Most often, the left hemispace is neglected, as the disorder is more frequent and severe following right hemisphere injury.

Clinically, the patient's head and eyes may be directed entirely towards the ipsilesional space (usually right). When there is an accompanying motor deficit, the patient may deny any problem with the affected limb (anosognosia), may say they are moving the limb normally as it hangs limply at their side, or may fail to recognize the affected limb as their own. Patients with neglect may fail to groom themselves properly on the neglected side, or may fail to eat food on the neglected side of the dinner plate. When reading, the patient may start towards the middle of a line rather than on the left, for example, reading ‘your eyes’ when shown the phrase ‘close your eyes’. It is important to note that basic sensory or motor disorders are not part of the neglect syndrome, although they may be present.

The phenomenon of extinction may occur either together or separately from neglect. Extinction is diagnosed by the patient being able to detect stimuli presented separately to either side of space, but only detecting one of the stimuli (usually right) when they are presented simultaneously. At times, the deficits associated with neglect are less dramatic and may only be apparent when the patient is asked to perform more specific tests such as bisecting lines or searching for targets among a set of irrelevant stimuli.

Numerous theories have been proposed to account for the deficits in neglect. Unfortunately, space constrains any discussion other than just a listing of various theories and their chief proponents. Explanations have included a distortion of internal representations (Bisiach), release of asymmetrically opposed attentional vectors (Kinsbourne), impaired attention towards the affected hemispace (Heilman and colleagues), impaired motor intentional behaviour (Heilman), impaired disengagement of the attentional focus from ipsilesional stimuli (Posner), distortion of the spatial reference frame (Jeannerod, Karnath), multidimensional impairment of selective attention (Mesulam), and altered premotor planning behaviours (Rizzolatti)^32,33.

Lesion sites causing neglect have been found throughout the network of cortical and subcortical areas responsible for attention. These regions include the posterior parietal cortex/temporoparietal junction, frontal eye fields, cingulate and supplementary motor cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, midbrain and superior colliculus². Typically, the lesions are on the right.

Only some functional imaging studies have demonstrated findings consistent with right hemispheric dominance for attention. Some of these studies have shown a greater number of activated regions on the right, while others have shown a larger size of the right-sided activations^19–21. However, it can be difficult to show significant hemispheric differences in attentional activation studies (personal observations) and the true nature of this difference may have to await a finer analysis of the time-course of these activations.

Only a few recent studies have been able to examine directly the deficits of neglect and extinction with functional imaging technology. Vuilleumier and colleagues studied a patient with neglect due to a right parietal lesion, who had intact visual fields³⁴. Event-related fMRI was used to show that non-perceived stimuli still activated the visual cortex. When stimuli were occasionally perceived, the visual cortex activations were expanded and activations were also seen in the left parietal cortex. Measures of inter-regional correlations involving frontal, parietal and visual areas also increased when the subject was aware of a stimulus. This study confirmed both bottom-up and top-down aspects of attentional processing, and was consistent with the theory that attention may be critical for conscious awareness^31,34.

	Conclusions

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Definition Attentional components Anatomical and behavioural... Disorders of attention Conclusions Key points for clinical... Acknowledgements References

 
Numerous recent imaging studies have begun to reveal the multifaceted nature of attentional behaviour and its disturbances. More importantly, long-held theories regarding attentional contributions to perceptual processing, motor selection and the internal choice of particular thoughts can now be studied directly. Event-related fMRI, event-related potential studies and newer studies with magneto-encephalography will allow improved spatial and temporal localization of the processes underlying this important aspect of cognition.

	Key points for clinical practice

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Definition Attentional components Anatomical and behavioural... Disorders of attention Conclusions Key points for clinical... Acknowledgements References

 

• •Attentional disturbances are ubiquitous in clinical practice. However, the multimodal and protean nature of the disturbances may make them difficult to recognize.
  
• •A confusional state is arguably the most important attentional disorder to diagnose, as its presence usually indicates an underlying acute medical condition.
  
• •Domain-specific attentional changes must be specifically sought, through careful cognitive testing. Identifying this class of disturbances is important when trying to distinguish disorders within a modality versus a partial deficit of attention. For example, in examining patients with memory complaints, it is critical to demonstrate whether the patient has a true amnestic disturbance versus a disorder of attention, as the anatomy and treatment of the associated disorders may be very different.
  
• •Hemispatial neglect should be sought particularly in patients with right hemisphere lesions. Because of the nature of neglect, i.e. a lack of awareness for the neglected hemispace, patients will never directly complain of this deficit although it is frequently noted by care-givers.
  

	Acknowledgements

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Definition Attentional components Anatomical and behavioural... Disorders of attention Conclusions Key points for clinical... Acknowledgements References

 
The preparation of this manuscript was supported by NIA grant AG00940.

	Footnotes

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Definition Attentional components Anatomical and behavioural... Disorders of attention Conclusions Key points for clinical... Acknowledgements References

 
Correspondence to: Darren R Gitelman MD, Northwestern University Medical School, 320 E Superior St, Searle 11-470, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

	References

Top Footnotes Abstract Introduction Definition Attentional components Anatomical and behavioural... Disorders of attention Conclusions Key points for clinical... Acknowledgements References

 

1. James W. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt, 1890
2. Mesulam M-M. Confusional states and spatial neglect. In: Mesulam M-M. (ed) Principles of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000; 174–256
3. Parasuraman R. The attentive brain: issues and prospects. In: Parasuraman R. (ed) The Attentive Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998; 3–16
4. Nobre AC, Coull JT, Mesulam M-M, Frith CD. The neural system for directing spatial and temporal attention compared with PET. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1997; 23: 300
5. Posner MI. Attention in cognitive neuroscience: an overview. In: Gazzaniga MS. (ed) The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995; 615–24
6. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Left visuo-spatial neglect, a meaningless entity? Cortex 1992; 28: 525–35[ISI][Medline]
7. Moruzzi G, Magoun HW. Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. Electoencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1949; 1: 459–73
8. Kinomura S, Larsson J, Gulyas B, Roland PE. Activation by attention of the human reticular formation and thalamic intralaminar nuclei. Science 1996; 271: 512–5[Abstract]
9. Egly R, Driver J, Rafal RD. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J Exp Psychol 1994; 123: 161–77
10. Vecera SP, Farah MJ. Does visual attention select objects or locations? J Exp Psychol 1994; 123: 146–60
11. Broadbent DE. Decision and Stress. London: Academic Press, 1971
12. Mackworth NH. Some factors affecting vigilance. Adv Sci 1957; 53: 389–93
13. Webster MJ, Ungerleider LG. Neuroanatomy of visual attention. In: Parasuraman R. (ed) The Attentive Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998; 19–34
14. Treisman A. Features and objects: the fourteenth Barlett memorial lecture. Q J Exp Psychol 1988; 40: 201–37
15. Mesulam M-M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol 1981; 10: 309–25[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
16. Mesulam M-M. Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Ann Neurol 1990; 28: 598–613
17. Posner MI, Petersen SE. The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 1990; 13: 25–42[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
18. Pardo JV, Fox PT, Raichle ME. Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature 1991; 349: 61–4[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Corbetta M, Miezin FM, Shulman GL, Petersen SE. A PET study of visuospatial attention. J Neurosci 1993; 13: 1202–26[Abstract]
20. Nobre AC, Sebestyen GN, Gitelman DR, Mesulam M-M, Frackowiak RSJ, Frith CD. Functional localisation of the neural network for visual spatial attention by positron-emission tomography. Brain 1997; 120: 515–33[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Gitelman DR, Nobre AC, Parrish T et al. A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioral and cognitive controls. Brain 1999; 122: 1093–106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Hopfinger JB, Buonocore MH, Mangun GR. The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nat Neurosci 2000; 3: 284–91[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
23. Beauchamp MS, Petit L, Ellmore TM, Ingeholm J, Haxby JV. A parametric fMRI study of overt and covert shifts of visuospatial attention. Neuroimage 2001; 14: 310–21[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
24. Gitelman DR, Parrish TB, Friston KJ, Mesulam M-M. Functional anatomy of visual search: regional segregations within the frontal eye fields and effective connectivity of the superior colliculus. Neuroimage 2002; 15: 970–82[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
25. Mesulam M-M, Nobre AC, Kim Y-H, Parrish TB, Gitelman DR. Heterogeneity of cingulate contributions to spatial attention. Neuroimage 2001; 13: 1065–72[ISI][Medline]
26. Desimone R, Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 1995; 18: 193–222[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
27. Corchs S, Deco G. Large-scale neural model for visual attention: integration of experimental single-cell and fMRI data. Cereb Cortex 2002; 12: 339–48[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Kastner S, Ungerleider LG. The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 1263–76[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
29. Driver J, Frackowiak RSJ. Neurobiological measures of human selective attention. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 1257–62[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
30. Doyle M, Warden D. Use of SPECT to evaluate postcardiotomy delirium. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153: 838–9[ISI][Medline]
31. Rees G, Russell C, Frith CD, Driver J. Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. Science 1999; 286: 2504–7[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Rizzolatti G, Berti A, Gallese V. Spatial neglect: neuropsychological bases, cortical circuits and theories. In: Boller F, Grafman J. (eds) Handbook of Neuropsychology, vol 1, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000; 503–37
33. Bisiach E, Vallar G. Unilateral neglect in humans. In: Boller F, Grafman J. (eds) Handbook of Neuropsychology, vol 1, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000; 459–502
34. Vuilleumier P, Sagiv N, Hazeltine E et al. Neural fate of seen and unseen faces in visuospatial neglect: a combined event-related functional MRI and event-related potential study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 3495–500[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. A. Sacco, K. L. Bannon, and T. P. George Nicotinic receptor mechanisms and cognition in normal states and neuropsychiatric disorders J Psychopharmacol, December 1, 2004; 18(4): 457 - 474. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract FREE Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to citation manager Search for citing articles in: ISI Web of Science (4) Request Permissions Disclaimer Google Scholar Articles by Gitelman, D. R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gitelman, D. R Related Collections Neurology Radiology Social Bookmarking          What's this?

Online ISSN 1471-8391 - Print ISSN 0007-1420

Copyright © 2008 Oxford University Press

Oxford Journals Oxford University Press

• Site Map
• Privacy Policy
• Frequently Asked Questions

Other Oxford University Press sites: Oxford University Press Oxford Journals Japan American National Biography Booksellers' Information Service Children's Fiction and Poetry Children's Reference Corporate & Special Sales Dictionaries Dictionary of National Biography Digital Reference English Language Teaching Higher Education Textbooks Humanities International Education Unit Law Medicine Music Online Products Oxford English Dictionary Reference Rights and Permissions Science School Books Social Sciences Very Short Introductions World's Classics