Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solassol, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solassol, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Immunology
Right arrow Infectious Diseases
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Medical Bulletin 66:87-97 (2003)
© 2003 The British Council

Prion propagation in cultured cells

Jérôme Solassol, Carole Crozet and Sylvain Lehmann

Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS UPR 1142, Montpellier, France


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cellular cultures supporting TSE...
 Use of prion-infected cell...
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Cell cultures represent relevant and useful experimental models of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). They are able to promote, upon subpassaging, stable and persistent replication of PrPSc as well as infectivity. To date, only a few cell culture models permissive to prion replication are available. Among them, mouse neuroblastoma cell lines (N2a) are most commonly used. While they correspond to homologous models supporting propagation of mouse-adapted scrapie strains, recent studies have reported heterologous models sensitive to natural occurring disease. Infected cell culture models have provided some valuable insights into the biogenesis of PrPSc in terms of conversion, subcellular localisations, physiopathological consequences and species-barrier determinants. They have also contributed to the screening and the study of possible therapeutic compounds and to the development of new strategies for the investigation of TSE-specific diagnostic markers.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cellular cultures supporting TSE...
 Use of prion-infected cell...
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) include mainly Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and Gerstmann-Straüssler syndrome in humans, and scrapie and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in animals1. Also called prion diseases, these fatal neurodegenerative disorders are remarkable since they occur in humans in infectious, sporadic, and genetic forms. One of the main characteristics of these diseases is the accumulation in the brain of a pathological protein, PrPSc, that derives2 from a normal protein of the host called PrPC. According to the ‘protein only’ hypothesis, the key event in the disease pathology consists of the conversion of normal PrPC into the pathogenic form PrPSc.

The normal biological function of PrPC and the mechanisms involved in neurodegeneration and TSE transmission are not completely defined. During the past two decades, considerable efforts have been made to establish culture models of genetic and infectious forms of TSEs and especially cellular cultures supporting TSE agent replication. These models present, from both a fundamental and applied point of view, obvious advantages including: (i) the ability to analyse, at the molecular and cellular levels, the biological properties of PrPC and PrPSc; (ii) the possibility of determining the nature of the infectious agent and the factors governing its propagation; (iii) the screening of drugs with potential therapeutic values; and (iv) the determination of biological markers of the infection with potential diagnostic and physiological interest.


    Cellular cultures supporting TSE agent replication
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cellular cultures supporting TSE...
 Use of prion-infected cell...
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The most straightforward approach to propagate prions ex vivo is to put infectious fractions in contact with cell culture and to check for the ‘replication’ of the agent. Different infectious fractions have been used, the simplest being represented by brain homogenates. In some instances, partially purified preparations (scrapie-associated fibrils, SAFs) have also been used3, but it is not clear if this results in a higher effectiveness of transmission. As for animal assays, pretreatment of the infectious fraction for 30 min at 80°C followed by sonication has been used to reduce the risk of transmission of conventional viral and bacterial agents. This method also reduces the toxicity of the fractions on cell cultures (personal observation). Following the ‘inoculation’ of the culture, the cells are generally washed extensively and passaged several times. Importantly, before the discovery of PrPSc, the success of prion transmission to cell culture was only assessed by the presence of infectivity. Animals were inoculated with cell extracts after sufficient passages in vitro to rule out the detection of the remaining infectivity from the inoculum.

With the demonstration of the close association between PrPSc production and prion propagation, the detection of this isoform became a useful marker in cell culture. It was then demonstrated4, using metabolic labelling, that infected cultures could generate new molecules of PrPSc. Several techniques of different sensitivities currently exist to detect the presence of PrPSc in prion-infected cells (Fig. 1). The most common and oldest technique is the SDS-PAGE analysis of cellular lysates treated with proteinase K, followed by Western blot analysis using carboxy-terminal anti-PrP antibodies. Recently, it has been shown5 for BSE diagnosis that the ELISA technique could increase the sensitivity of the detection of PrPSc. Another method, which seems quicker and more sensitive, is the cell blotting technique. In fact, Bosque et al. have shown that Western blotting could detect PrPSc when 10% of the cells of a small well were infected with prions, whereas cell blotting was positive with only 1% of the cells infected6. Another paradigm developed by Winklhofer et al. is represented by a filter retention assay for PrPSc that measures two diagnostic biochemical properties of PrPSc in combination – proteinase K resistance and the presence of a detergent-insoluble aggregated state7. Finally, Vilette et al. have used a post-embedded method able to detect single infected cells8. This method has the advantage of evaluating the percentage of infected cells present in a particular culture. It is significant that the first data obtained by dilution and subcloning of infected N2a cells revealed that only 1% of the cells were actually infected9. More efficient cell-culture models6,10 (see below) seem to have up to 30% of cells actually accumulating PrPSc. The amount of infectivity present in the culture is also an important issue. Recent data on permissible cell lines revealed that cultures have the potential to accumulate as many infectious units per mg of protein as brain from affected animals8. In addition, the presence of infectivity has been detected in the culture medium of infected cells10,11, confirming that these ex vivo infections are very efficient in propagating the infectious agent and represent a useful tool to study prion conversion and to produce prions for a variety of further studies.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Different ways to detect PrPSc in prion-infected cells. (A) Western blot. Lysates of N2a or prion-infected N2a cells (ScN2a) were treated with proteinase K and analysed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with anti-PrP antibodies. (B) Slot blot. Cell lysates of N2a and ScN2a cells were filtered through nitrocellulose membranes with a slot blot device and PrPSc detected as described in (C). (C) Cell blot. N2a or ScN2a grown on cover-slips were directly transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane and PrPSc was revealed, after proteinase K digestion, with anti PrP antibodies by Western blotting.

 
As detailed below, experimental models of prion propagation in cell culture can be arranged into different categories depending on the origin of the inoculum and of the cell culture (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Prion-susceptible cell lines

 

Homologous cell culture models for prion propagation
To avoid species-barrier phenomenon that decrease the effectiveness of prion propagation, mostly because of differences in primary amino sequences of PrPs, it made sense to construct ex vivo homologous cell culture models. In these models, PrPSc present in the inoculum has the same species origin as the one expressed by cultured cells. Moreover, it was also logical to focus initially on neuronal cells that seemed to be the main target for prions in vivo. The first attempt to obtain infected TSE culture cells was performed as early as 197012 and pursued successfully by the groups of Chesebro and Prusiner mainly using mouse neuroblastoma N2a cell lines (see Table 1)3,13. These cells, which support the replication of the RML (Rocky Mountain Laboratory) strain, are currently the most intensively described and used model. Surprisingly, once infected, N2a cells display no obvious cytolytic changes13. In 1983, Markovits et al. described increased catecholamine levels and decreased free serotonin and noradrenalin levels in scrapie-positive N2a cultures compared to uninfected cells14. Several investigators have described various morphological differences and an increased rate of cell proliferation in scrapie-infected cells14, while others have described the opposite effect15. Unfortunately, it is not clear that the changes described were necessarily due only to the scrapie agent rather than to clonal differences or to other factors present in the inoculum used to infect the cells. In addition, scrapie-infected N2a cells showed alterations in bradykinin-mediated responses and in membrane fluidity, although these abnormalities did not seem to affect the growth or the viability of the cells16,17.

As demonstrated in transgenic animals, transmission of the TSE agent in cultures might also be improved by increasing the level of PrP. In our laboratory, we have developed murine PrP overexpressed mouse neuroblastoma N2a#58 cell lines readily infected by three mouse PrPSc scrapie strains – Chandler, 139A and 22L10.

It is noteworthy that other neuroblastoma cell lines replicate prion agent with the same efficacy as N2a cells (Table 1)3,9,10,14,18. Also widely used, the hypothalamic cell line called GT1 represents a reliable support for prion replication ex vivo11. GT1 cells are well-differentiated, neuronal cell lines originating from the central nervous system and were established from gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons immortalised by genetically targeted tumourigenesis in transgenic mice. Subclones of GT1 cells, that were stably transfected with the trkA gene encoding the high-affinity nerve growth factor (NGF) receptor, increased the viability of scrapie-infected cells and reduced the morphological and biochemical signs of vacuolisation and apoptosis present in untransfected GT1 cells11. Recently, Nishida et al. have also developed GT1 cells that are able to support prion replication from 22L, Chandler, and 139A strains10. Since PrPSc accumulates mainly in central nervous system cells, the above cell lines have been chosen for their neuronal phenotype. However, peripheral nervous system cells such as Schwann cells are also able to support propagation of prions in culture19,20. These models might be useful in the study of the peripheral steps of prion invasion8,19,20.

From the different studies published so far, the following conclusions can be drawn regarding the transmission of prions in homologous models: (i) only some strains can replicate in one particular cell line; (ii) only some cells from a culture become infected and subcloning could improve the susceptibility to prions; (iii) the PrP expression level is an important factor for the detection of a successful infection; and (iv) the propagation of prions induces only subtle changes in the phenotype of the cultures.

Heterologous cell culture models for prion propagation
This section summarises some examples of successful ex vivo propagation of prions in which there was a mismatch between the species origin of the inoculum, the PrP expressed, or the cell line. In 1984, while testing the transmission of prions in various models, Rubenstein et al. showed for the first time that PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells could be readily infected with mouse prions21. Prior to infection, cells were differentiated into neuron-like cells with nerve growth factor. Interestingly, scrapie agent replication in these cultures was accompanied by decreases in the activities of enzymes involved in the cholinergic, but not the adrenergic, neurotransmitter pathways22. This was the first demonstration that a species barrier could be overcome in cell culture.

A common feature of susceptible cell lines is that they only support the propagation of TSE strains that have been experimentally adapted to rodents. Recently, Vilette et al. developed a new heterologous model for naturally occurring sheep scrapie. This model was obtained by stable expression of the ovine PrP gene in a rabbit epithelial cell line (RK13)8. The authors showed that the expression of heterologous PrP in an otherwise refractory system, such as the rabbit system, is sufficient to cross the species barrier ex vivo.

These experimental systems are important since relevant cell culture models supporting naturally occurring TSE agents, including sheep scrapie or BSE, are needed when one considers the impact of these diseases on public health. It is noteworthy that the successful propagation of human CJD in cell cultures has only been reported once23.

Animal-derived models for ex vivo prion propagation
An original approach to prion propagation in cell culture is the use of animal-derived cells. Several authors have tried to derive infected cultures directly from infected animals. This approach has been successful for the SMB cell line established from cultures derived from the brain of a mouse clinically affected by the Chandler scrapie strain12,24. It has also been successful when combined with the immortalisation of cells derived directly from ovine PrP transgenic mice infected with natural sheep scrapie20. One can also use cell lines derived directly from PrP knock-out mice eventually expressing heterologous PrP (ovine, bovine and human). Indeed, it has been shown that transgenic mice expressing human PrP became more susceptible to human CJD prions upon ablation of the mouse PrP gene, thus avoiding competitive interactions between PrP from different species25. Developing this idea, work in our laboratory is being directed at attempts to infect hypothalamic PrPo/o cells26 transfected with human or bovine PrP.


    Use of prion-infected cell-culture models
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cellular cultures supporting TSE...
 Use of prion-infected cell...
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Considering the extensive studies that can be done in cell culture, prion-infected cultures that produce PrPSc represent a useful model to understand the cellular and molecular events leading to the formation of PrPSc.

Cell biology of PrPSc
From various cellular and biological studies of infected cells, it was demonstrated that PrPC was the precursor of PrPSc and that the PrPC endocytic pathway was essential for the generation of the abnormal isoform4,27,28. PrPSc seems also to have a longer half-life than PrPC and to accumulate inside of the cell in the lysosomal compartment29. The exact subcellular localisation of the conversion of PrPC into PrPSc is still not completely defined, but recent data suggest that the endoplasmic reticulum could play a role in this event30.

Physiopathology of prion diseases
One of the most important issues in the study of cell cultures replicating the agent of prion disease was to look for a possible pathological consequence of the infection. Actually, in most cases, prion infection has little or no apparent effect on the cell line viability or phenotype. However, in differentiated PC12 cells, prion replication alters the catecholamine metabolism of the cells22. In GT1 cells also, a pathological phenotype was observed with an increase in the number of apoptotic cells in the infected cultures11. A recent study by Milhavet et al.31 demonstrated that prion infection impaired the cellular response to oxidative stress in GT1 cells. This suggests that the normal function of PrPC, that is also linked to this response31, may be altered by the infection. Since PrPC seems to play a role in signal transduction, metabolism of metal ions or activities of anti-oxidant enzymes, further studies in infected cellular models will be necessary to evaluate, at a molecular level, the impact of infection on these functions.

Therapeutic research of prion diseases
Infected cell cultures have been widely used to discover inhibitors of scrapie formation, laying the groundwork for the development of anti-prion therapeutic agents. Most of these studies have been made in ScN2a cells. Many compounds decrease the amount of PrPSc produced in cell culture (for a review, see Brown32) by a variety of different mechanisms32,33. Some of these anti-prion agents have been tested in vivo and act on peripheral and/or central nervous system phase of TSE infection32.

Cell cultures can thus be considered as a relevant pre-screening step for the discovery of new anti-prion drugs. However, even if a drug does show promise in tissue culture experiments, it may still not be therapeutically useful as cellular systems are very simplified models compared to the in vivo situation.

Scrapie strains in cell culture
A better understanding of the molecular strain determinants could be obtained from studying infected cells. For example, it has been shown that SMB cells could be infected with different strains of scrapie and that the biological properties and prion-protein profiles characteristic of each of the original strains were propagated in this model34. In addition, we have shown that N2a#58 cells carrying the murine Prnp-a allele could be infected with mouse PrPSc–A scrapie strains (Chandler, 139A and 22L) but not with PrPSc–B strains (87V and 22A). To determine whether this phenomenon is due to the Prnp allele chosen in our study, an interesting approach would be to test cell lines transfected with the Prnp-b allele10.

Diagnosis of prion diseases and public health research
An interesting potential for infected cell cultures may be the discovery of biological markers of prion infection, mainly by comparing control versus infected cultures. This type of experiment was first performed at a genetic level. With the development of sophisticated proteomic approaches, several groups are looking for differentially expressed proteins that could be used as diagnostic markers or at least could give some clue as to the physiopathological event leading to prion propagation. Having developed cell lines highly susceptible to prion infection6,10, another potential of cell culture consists of the detection of infectivity in various biological samples. The basic idea is to test the presence of infectivity in susceptible cell lines. We were able for example to demonstrate that susceptible cell lines could detect infectivity over a 4-log range starting at 50 ID5035. In addition, Zobeley et al. have recently shown that cell cultures could also be used to assess the efficacy of sterilisation conditions on surface-bound prions using thin stainless-steel wire segments36. In the future, cell culture based assays to titre prion infectivity will certainly be developed.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cellular cultures supporting TSE...
 Use of prion-infected cell...
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Studies made in scrapie-infected cell cultures have given relevant information concerning PrPSc propagation. It is clear that one cell line can be infected by several prion strains. Conversely, it appears that one strain can infect several different cell lines. In addition to the level and the type of PrP molecules expressed in cells, several other factors may also account for this phenomenon. First, it is possible that cell lines differ in the expression of co-factors necessary for the replication of the agent (chaperon, protein X)25. Second, the general trafficking of PrP in the different lines can play a role in susceptibility. The endogenous cleavage and degradation pathways of PrP may also be involved. Finally, post-translational modifications of PrP (e.g. glycosylation) could modulate the conversion. From the applied research and public health point of view, cell cultures are very useful models for the screening and study of therapeutic compounds and for research into new diagnostic markers which are urgently needed.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cellular cultures supporting TSE...
 Use of prion-infected cell...
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
We thank Marie Arlotto for the slot blotting experiment. JS is the recipient of a fellowship from the ALMP (Association de Lutte contre les Maladies à Prion, Paris, France) and the Carrefour International Foundation (Paris, France).


    Footnotes
 
Correspondence to: Dr Sylvain Lehmann, Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS UPR 1142, 141 rue de la Cardonille, F-34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Cellular cultures supporting TSE...
 Use of prion-infected cell...
 Conclusions
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Collinge J. Prion diseases of humans and animals: their causes and molecular basis. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001; 24: 519–50[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Prusiner SB. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 1982; 216: 136–44[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Race RE, Fadness LH, Chesebro B. Characterization of scrapie infection in mouse neuroblastoma cells. J Gen Virol 1987; 68: 1391–9[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Caughey B, Race RE, Ernst D, Buchmeier MJ, Chesebro B. Prion protein biosynthesis in scrapie-infected and uninfected neuroblastoma cells. J Virol 1989; 63: 175–81[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Grassi J, Creminon C, Frobert Y et al. Specific determination of the proteinase K-resistant form of the prion protein using two-site immunometric assays. Application to the post-mortem diagnosis of BSE. Arch Virol Suppl 2000; 16: 197–205[Medline]
  6. Bosque PJ, Prusiner SB. Cultured cell sublines highly susceptible to prion infection. J Virol 2000; 74: 4377–86[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Winklhofer KF, Hartl FU, Tatzelt J. A sensitive filter retention assay for the detection of PrP(Sc) and the screening of anti-prion compounds. FEBS Lett 2001; 503: 41–5[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Vilette D, Andreoletti O, Archer F et al. Ex vivo propagation of infectious sheep scrapie agent in heterologous epithelial cells expressing ovine prion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 4055–9[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Race R. The scrapie agent in vitro. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 1991; 172: 181–93[Medline]
  10. Nishida N, Harris DA, Vilette D et al. Successful transmission of three mouse-adapted scrapie strains to murine neuroblastoma cell lines overexpressing wild-type mouse prion protein. J Virol 2000; 74: 320–5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Schatzl HM, Laszlo L, Holtzman DM et al. A hypothalamic neuronal cell line persistently infected with scrapie prions exhibits apoptosis. J Virol 1997; 71: 8821–31[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Clarke MC, Haig DA. Evidence for the multiplication of scrapie agent in cell culture. Nature 1970; 225: 100–1[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Butler DA, Scott MR, Bockman JM et al. Scrapie-infected murine neuroblastoma cells produce protease-resistant prion proteins. J Virol 1988; 62: 1558–64[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Markovits P, Dautheville C, Dormont D, Dianoux L, Latarjet R. In vitro propagation of the scrapie agent. I. Transformation of mouse glia and neuroblastoma cells after infection with the mouse-adapted scrapie strain c-506. Acta Neuropathol 1983; 60: 75–80[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Borchelt DR, Scott M, Taraboulos A, Stahl N, Prusiner SB. Scrapie and cellular prion proteins differ in their kinetics of synthesis and topology in cultured cells. J Cell Biol 1990; 110: 743–52[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kristensson K, Feuerstein B, Taraboulos A, Hyun WC, Prusiner SB, DeArmond SJ. Scrapie prions alter receptor-mediated calcium responses in cultured cells. Neurology 1993; 43: 2335–41[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wong K, Qiu Y, Hyun W et al. Decreased receptor-mediated calcium response in prion-infected cells correlates with decreased membrane fluidity and IP3 release. Neurology 1996; 47: 741–50[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ostlund P, Lindegren H, Pettersson C, Bedecs K. Altered insulin receptor processing and function in scrapie-infected neuroblastoma cell lines. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 2001; 97: 161–70[Medline]
  19. Follet J, Lemaire-Vieille C, Blanquet-Grossard F et al. PrP expression and replication by Schwann cells: implications in prion spreading. J Virol 2002; 76: 2434–9[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Archer F, Perrot G, Vilette D et al. Schwann cells as a possible player in prion propagation. International Conference on Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies. Edinburgh, 2002
  21. Rubenstein R, Carp RI, Callahan SM. In vitro replication of scrapie agent in a neuronal model: infection of PC12 cells. J Gen Virol 1984; 65: 2191–8[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Rubenstein R, Deng H, Scalici CL, Papini MC. Alterations in neurotransmitter-related enzyme activity in scrapie-infected PC12 cells. J Gen Virol 1991; 72: 1279–85[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ladogana A, Liu Q, Xi YG, Pocchiari M. Proteinase-resistant protein in human neuroblastoma cells infected with brain material from Creutzfeldt-Jakob patient. Lancet 1995; 345: 594–5[Medline]
  24. Clarke MC, Haig DA. Multiplication of scrapie agent in cell culture. Res Vet Sci 1970; 11: 500–1[Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Telling GC, Scott M, Mastriani J et al. Prion propagation in mice expressing human and chimeric PrP transgenes implicates the interaction of cellular PrP with another protein. Cell 1995; 83: 79–90[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Kuwahara C, Takeuchi AM, Nishimura T et al. Prions prevent neuronal cell-line death. Nature 1999; 400: 225–6[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Taraboulos A, Scott M, Semenov A, Avrahami D, Prusiner SB. Biosynthesis of the prion proteins in scrapie-infected cells in culture. Braz J Med Biol Res 1994; 27: 303–7[Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Caughey B, Raymond GJ. The scrapie-associated form of PrP is made from a cell surface precursor that is both protease- and phospholipase-sensitive. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 18217–23[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Taraboulos A, Serban D, Prusiner SB. Scrapie prion proteins accumulate in the cytoplasm of persistently infected cultured cells. J Cell Biol 1990; 110: 2117–32[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Béranger F, Mangé A, Solassol J, Lehmann S. Cell culture models of prion diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 289: 311–6[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Milhavet O, McMahon HE, Rachidi W et al. Prion infection impairs the cellular response to oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 13937–42[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Brown P. Drug therapy in human and experimental transmissible spongiform encephalopathy. Neurology 2002; 58: 1720–5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Mange A, Nishida N, Milhavet O, McMahon HEM, Casanova D, Lehmann S. Amphotericin B inhibits the generation of the scrapie isoform of the prion protein in infected cultures. J Virol 2000; 74: 3135–40[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Birkett CR, Hennion RM, Bembridge DA et al. Scrapie strains maintain biological phenotypes on propagation in a cell line in culture. EMBO J 2001; 20: 3351–8[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Lehmann S, Laude H, Harris DA, Carp C, Vilette D, Katamine S et al. Ex vivo transmission of mouse adapted prion strains to N2a and GT1-7 cell line. In: Iqbal K, Sisodia SS, Winbald B (eds) Alzheimer's disease. Advances in Etiology, Pathogenesis and Therapeutics, London:Wiley, 2001:679–686
  36. Zobeley E, Flechsig E, Cozzio A, Enari M, Weissmann C. Infectivity of scrapie prions bound to a stainless steel surface. Mol Med 1999; 5: 240–3[Web of Science][Medline]
  37. Elleman CJ. Attempts to establish the scrapie agent in cell lines. Vet Res Commun 1984; 8: 309–16[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Cherednichenko Yu N, Mikhailova GR, Rajcani J, Zhdanov VM. In vitro studies with the scrapie agent. Acta Virol 1985; 29: 285–93[Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Roikhel VM, Fokina GI, Lisak VM, Kondakova LI, Korolev MB, Pogodina VV. Persistence of the scrapie agent in glial cells from rat Gasserian ganglion. Acta Virol 1987; 31: 36–42[Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Clarke MC, Millson GC. Infection of a cell line of mouse L fibroblasts with scrapie agent. Nature 1976; 261: 144–5[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Chesebro B, Wehrly K, Caughey B, Nishio J, Ernst D, Race R. Foreign PrP expression and scrapie infection in tissue culture cell lines. Dev Biol Stand 1993; 80: 131–40[Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. H. Neale, S. J. Mountjoy, J. C. Edwards, D. Vilette, H. Laude, O. Windl, and G. C. Saunders
Infection of Cell Lines with Experimental and Natural Ovine Scrapie Agents
J. Virol., March 1, 2010; 84(5): 2444 - 2452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. Cronier, V. Beringue, A. Bellon, J.-M. Peyrin, and H. Laude
Prion Strain- and Species-Dependent Effects of Antiprion Molecules in Primary Neuronal Cultures
J. Virol., December 15, 2007; 81(24): 13794 - 13800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Ghaemmaghami, P.-W. Phuan, B. Perkins, J. Ullman, B. C. H. May, F. E. Cohen, and S. B. Prusiner
From the Cover: Cell division modulates prion accumulation in cultured cells
PNAS, November 13, 2007; 104(46): 17971 - 17976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. Paquet, N. Daude, M.-P. Courageot, J. Chapuis, H. Laude, and D. Vilette
PrPc Does Not Mediate Internalization of PrPSc but Is Required at an Early Stage for De Novo Prion Infection of Rov Cells
J. Virol., October 1, 2007; 81(19): 10786 - 10791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Maas, M. Geissen, M. H. Groschup, R. Rost, T. Onodera, H. Schatzl, and I. M. Vorberg
Scrapie Infection of Prion Protein-deficient Cell Line upon Ectopic Expression of Mutant Prion Proteins
J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2007; 282(26): 18702 - 18710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Kristiansen, M. J. Messenger, P.-C. Klohn, S. Brandner, J. D. F. Wadsworth, J. Collinge, and S. J. Tabrizi
Disease-related Prion Protein Forms Aggresomes in Neuronal Cells Leading to Caspase Activation and Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem., November 18, 2005; 280(46): 38851 - 38861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Horonchik, S. Tzaban, O. Ben-Zaken, Y. Yedidia, A. Rouvinski, D. Papy-Garcia, D. Barritault, I. Vlodavsky, and A. Taraboulos
Heparan Sulfate Is a Cellular Receptor for Purified Infectious Prions
J. Biol. Chem., April 29, 2005; 280(17): 17062 - 17067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. Paquet, E. Sabuncu, J.-L. Delaunay, H. Laude, and D. Vilette
Prion Infection of Epithelial Rov Cells Is a Polarized Event
J. Virol., July 1, 2004; 78(13): 7148 - 7152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solassol, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solassol, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Immunology
Right arrow Infectious Diseases
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?