Skip Navigation


British Medical Bulletin Advance Access originally published online on September 3, 2007
British Medical Bulletin 2007 84(1):5-23; doi:10.1093/bmb/ldm022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
84/1/5    most recent
ldm022v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maffulli, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, R.
Right arrow Articles by Maffulli, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery
Right arrow Sports Medicine
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review

Ruth Crawford{dagger}, Gayle Walley{dagger},{ddagger}, Stephen Bridgman{dagger},{ddagger} and Nicola Maffulli{dagger},{ddagger},*

{dagger} University of Keele, Keele University Medical School, Thornburrow Drive, Hartshill, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 7QB, UK
{ddagger} University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 6QG, UK
Newcastle-under-Lyme Primary Care NHS Trust, Civic Offices, Merrial Street, Newcastle-under-Lyme ST5 2AZ, UK

* Correspondence to: Nicola Maffulli, University of Keele, Keele University Medical School, Thornburrow Drive, Hartshill, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 7QB, UK. E-mail: n.maffulli{at}keele.ac.uk

Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is of great aid in the diagnosis of knee lesions. Most diagnostic studies comparing MRI and arthroscopy have shown good diagnostic performance in detecting lesions of the menisci and cruciate ligaments. Nevertheless, arthroscopy has remained the reference standard for the diagnosis of internal derangements of the knee, against which alternative diagnostic modalities should be compared.

Methods: We took arthroscopy to be the ‘gold standard’, and we undertook a systematic review of MRI and arthroscopy in the diagnosis of internal derangements of the knee. We used Coleman scoring methodology to identify scientifically sound articles in a reproducible format.

Results: MRI is highly accurate in diagnosing meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. It is the most appropriate screening tool before therapeutic arthroscopy. It is preferable to diagnostic arthroscopy in most patients because it avoids the surgical risks of arthroscopy. The results of MRI differ for medial and lateral meniscus and ACL, with only 85% accuracy.

Conclusions: Study design characteristics should also be taken into account whenever a study on MRI assessing its diagnostic performance is designed or reviewed.

Level of evidence: II, systematic review of level II studies.

Keywords: MRI • arthroscopy • patient outcome • systematic review

Accepted for publication July 27, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.