Skip Navigation



British Medical Bulletin Advance Access published online on April 4, 2007
British Medical Bulletin, doi:10.1093/bmb/ldm003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
81-82/1/7    most recent
ldm003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eisinger, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eisinger, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Prophylactic mastectomy: ethical issues

Francois Eisinger*,{dagger},{ddagger}

{dagger} Department of Oncogenetics Prevention and Screening, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, France
{ddagger} INSERM UMR 599, ERMES, Marseille, France

* Correspondence to: Francois Eisinger, 232 Bd St Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France. E-mail: eisinger{at}marseille.inserm.fr

Introduction: Why in particular should prophylactic mastectomy be seen more as an ethical concern than as a strictly medical question? In this article, four main explanations will be discussed.

Main points: First, a risky condition is not a disease and prevention does not improve well-being. The benefits are only statistical and make sense at the population level. Secondly, the cause of the risk is a genetic factor and some might argue about genetic ‘exceptionalism’. Thirdly, there is no organ as, connected to femininity, sensuality, sexuality, adulthood and motherhood as the breast. Lastly, making tough and complex choices requires assistance from ethics.

Areas of agreement: Among ethical principles, western countries often rely on autonomy. The physician has to deliver all the relevant information; based on this ‘knowledge’ and using their own values, patients will take a decision.

Area of controversy: In 1998 in France, national recommendations set a list of criteria to fulfil, reducing autonomy.

Emerging areas for developing research: It might be expected that this tough issue will be solved, thanks to the improvement of prevention and therapeutic efficacy.

Keywords: genes BRCA1 • genes BRCA2 • risk management • personal autonomy

Accepted for publication February 6, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.