<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>British Medical Bulletin - current issue</title>
<link>http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>British Medical Bulletin - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1471-8391</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>June 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>British Medical Bulletin</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0007-1420</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/7?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/37?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/53?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/63?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/71?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/85?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/111?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/133?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></title>
<link>http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vetter, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bmb/ldp018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The British Council</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>5</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/7?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Grand challenges in global health governance]]></title>
<link>http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/7?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This review identifies an agenda for global health by highlighting the current &lsquo;grand challenges&rsquo; related to governance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Sources</st>
<p>Literature from the disciplines of health policy and medicine, conference presentations and documents, and materials from international agencies (such as the World Health Organization).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of agreement</st>
<p>The present approach to global health governance has proven to be inadequate and major changes are necessary.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of controversy</st>
<p>The source of problems behind the current global health governance challenges have not always been agreed upon, but this paper attempts to highlight the recurrent themes and topics of consensus that have emerged in recent years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Growing points and areas timely for developing research</st>
<p>A solution to the &lsquo;grand challenges&rsquo; in global health governance is urgently needed and serves as an area for developing research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gostin, L. O., Mok, E. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Health Policy]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bmb/ldp014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Grand challenges in global health governance]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The British Council</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cellular reprogramming and pluripotency induction]]></title>
<link>http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Cellular reprogramming is the process of directing mature cells to a primitive state of gene expression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Sources of data</st>
<p>Medline searches using the keywords &lsquo;pluripotency&rsquo;, &lsquo;induce&rsquo; (and derivatives), and/or &lsquo;stem&rsquo; limited to the years 2006 to the present and other selected literature known to the author.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of agreement</st>
<p>Since 2006, there has been a cavalcade of scientific works describing so-called &lsquo;direct reprogramming&rsquo; wherein somatic cells are forced into a state of gene expression very similar to embryonic stem cells. These findings build upon prior research using nuclear transfer (cloning) and even older efforts to understand developmental processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of controversy</st>
<p>While already of tremendous research value, it remains to be seen how (if) direct reprogramming methodologies will be refined for clinical use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas timely for developing research</st>
<p>A greater understanding of epigenetics, the process by which different patterns of gene expression are established, maintained and redirected, will continue to be enlightened by advances in cellular reprogramming.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lensch, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Genetics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bmb/ldp011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cellular reprogramming and pluripotency induction]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The British Council</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>35</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/37?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rotaviruses and rotavirus vaccines]]></title>
<link>http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/37?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Rotaviruses (RVs) are an important cause of acute gastroenteritis in infants and young children worldwide, resulting in more than 600 000 deaths per annum, mainly in developing countries. Since the 1980s, there has been intensive research on the development of RV vaccine candidates, and since 2006 two vaccines have been licensed in many countries.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Sources of data</st>
<p>The scientific literature since the 1970s has been consulted, and the results of original research carried out in authors' laboratories were used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of agreement</st>
<p>There are firmly established data on virus particle structure, genome composition, gene&ndash;protein assignment, protein-function assignment (incomplete), virus classification, the mechanisms of several steps of the replication cycle (adsorption, primary transcription, virus maturation&mdash;all partial), several mechanisms of pathogenesis, aspects of the immune response, diagnosis, illness and treatment, epidemiology and vaccine development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of controversy</st>
<p>Research on the following areas is still in full flux and in part not generally accepted: several steps of the replication cycle (mechanism of viral entry into host cells, mechanisms of packaging and reassortment of viral RNAs, morphogenesis of subviral particles in viroplasms and maturation of virus particles in the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) with temporary acquisition and subsequent loss of an envelope), the true correlates of protection and the long-term effectiveness of RV vaccines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Growing research</st>
<p>Recently, a system that allows carrying out reverse genetics with some of the RV genes has been established which, however, has limitations. There is intensive research ongoing, which is trying to develop better and universally applicable reverse genetics systems. There is broad research on the molecular mechanisms of the immune response and on which immunological parameter correlates best with lasting protection from severe RV disease. Research into other than live attenuated vaccines is growing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas timely for developing research</st>
<p>The establishment of better reverse genetics systems for RVs is the most important research goal for both the understanding of the molecular biology of RVs and the development of new and safe RV vaccines. The black boxes of our knowledge on aspects of RV replication (RNA packaging, RNA replication, control of reassortment and functions of the non-structural RV proteins) are under intensive research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Desselberger, U., Manktelow, E., Li, W., Cheung, W., Iturriza-Gomara, M., Gray, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bmb/ldp009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rotaviruses and rotavirus vaccines]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The British Council</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>51</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/53?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Should sildenafil be available over the counter?]]></title>
<link>http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/53?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>This article considers the process of re-classification of prescription drugs from prescription-only medications to over-the-counter (OTC) prescription drugs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Sources of data</st>
<p>The recent change in classification for emergency contraception and simvastatin is explored in detail with similarities and differences being considered for a similar argument to be made for sildenafil.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of agreement</st>
<p>The benefits for patients, physicians and other healthcare professionals are considered in detail.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of controversy</st>
<p>We raise concerns about recently developed and existing patient group directions that, although extensive in their assessment, may omit to identify significant contributory factors which would necessitate appropriate medical intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Growing points</st>
<p>While the decision for re-classification to OTC would depend on a number of factors, we argue that, with the proviso of proper assessments being made, sildenafil should be made available as an OTC medication.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas timely for developing research</st>
<p>The safety and use of OTC medications for erectile dysfunction at a time when many first line prescription agents are reaching generic status.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rubin, N., Wylie, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Psychiatry]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bmb/ldp001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Should sildenafil be available over the counter?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The British Council</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>62</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>53</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/63?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[From prescription-only to over-the-counter medicines ('PoM to P'): time for an intermediate category]]></title>
<link>http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/63?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Increasing numbers of medicines are being made available over the counter in the UK, by purchase in a pharmacy or from other less well-regulated outlets. When this is allowed by the Licensing Authority, it is often subject to certain restrictions. However, some drugs that could usefully be converted from prescription-only medicines (PoM status) to over-the-counter sales in a pharmacy (P status) are not suitable for full over-the-counter status, even with restrictions; and in some cases restrictions vitiate the usefulness of the medicine.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of agreement</st>
<p>Drugs that can acceptably be switched from PoM status to P status include those that are used in the treatment of minor ailments or injuries, for health promotion or in palliative care.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of controversy</st>
<p>However, not all drugs that are being switched fall into these categories. Ready availability of antimicrobial drugs over the counter, one of which (azithromycin) has recently been switched, could encourage the emergence of resistant organisms. Drugs that are used for long-term treatment and lifestyle drugs are also controversial, particularly if their adverse effects are of potential concern. On the other hand, the availability of many drugs via the internet removes the ability of regulators to control the supply of such drugs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>A possible solution</st>
<p>A new category of purchase, Pharmacist Consultation and Supply, with built-in safeguards, could improve the availability of some medicines under more careful control than is currently available for over-the-counter medicines.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aronson, J. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Psychiatry]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bmb/ldp015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[From prescription-only to over-the-counter medicines ('PoM to P'): time for an intermediate category]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The British Council</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>69</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>63</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/71?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Heart rate as a treatable cardiovascular risk factor]]></title>
<link>http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/71?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Although several epidemiological studies demonstrate the association between resting heart rate (HR) and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, an elevated HR remains a neglected cardiovascular risk factor.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Sources of data</st>
<p>This review summarizes the results of published studies on the relationship between elevated HR and cardiovascular risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of agreement</st>
<p>The role of HR in myocardial ischaemia in coronary patients is well known. Experimental data and clinical observations support the importance of HR in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and plaque rupture. A large body of evidence points to high resting HR as a risk factor for mortality in various populations, including coronary patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of controversy</st>
<p>HR reduction is suggested to be a mechanism explaining the prognostic benefit of beta-blockers after myocardial infarction or in heart failure patients. However, it was unclear whether HR reduction <I>per se</I> directly affects cardiovascular prognosis. Treatment with ivabradine, a pure HR-reducing agent, provides an opportunity to assess the effects of selectively lowering HR without altering other aspects of cardiac function.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Growing points</st>
<p>The results of the recent Morbidity&ndash;Mortality Evaluation of the <I>I</I><SUB>f</SUB> Inhibitor Ivabradine in Patients with Coronary Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction study underline the importance of HR reduction in the management of stable coronary artery disease. The prospective analysis of data from the placebo arm demonstrated that elevated resting HR (&ge;70 bpm) is a strong independent predictor of clinical outcomes. Consistent with these data, ivabradine significantly improved coronary outcomes in patients with a HR of 70 bpm or more.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas timely for development</st>
<p>These data support the importance of HR in the management of stable coronary artery disease to assess prognosis and to guide optimal therapy.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tardif, J.-C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bmb/ldp016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Heart rate as a treatable cardiovascular risk factor]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The British Council</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>84</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>71</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/85?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevention of adhesions in surgery of the flexor tendons of the hand: what is the evidence?]]></title>
<link>http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/85?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Despite advances in knowledge and refinements of technique, the management of flexor tendon injuries within the digital sheath continues to present a formidable challenge. This in turn has led to a massive expansion in search of modified surgical therapies and various adjuvant therapies, which could prevent adhesion formation without compromising digital function.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Sources of data</st>
<p>A search of PubMed, Medline, CINAHL and Embase databases was performed using the keywords &lsquo;tendon adhesion prevention&rsquo;, &lsquo;tendon healing&rsquo;, &lsquo;adhesion prevention in tendons&rsquo; and &lsquo;adjuvants for adhesion prevention&rsquo;. Studies detailing the use of surgical, pharmacological and non-pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention in digital flexor tendons were identified, and their bibliographies were thoroughly reviewed to identify further related articles. This search identified 41 studies, which investigated the use of various pharmacological agents in adhesion prevention in digital tendons.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of agreement</st>
<p>There is a need to develop and utilize an optimal method for the prevention of adhesions in the flexor tendons of the hand, due to post-surgical complications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of controversy</st>
<p>Even though there have been significant advances in the prevention of adhesions in flexor tendons, it remains to be proved which, if any, of the current methods are the most beneficial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Growing points</st>
<p>The only thing that appears clinically justified in adhesion prevention is the need for early post-operative mobilization of digits after tendon injury or repair but the best method of mobilization remains controversial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas timely for developing research</st>
<p>Suggested changes in surgical techniques and various proposed pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities need to withstand the test of adequately powered human trials, before their justification for potential benefit in clinical practice is accepted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khanna, A., Friel, M., Gougoulias, N., Longo, U. G., Maffulli, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Sports Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bmb/ldp013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevention of adhesions in surgery of the flexor tendons of the hand: what is the evidence?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The British Council</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>109</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>85</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/111?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does exercise increase the risk of upper respiratory tract infections?]]></title>
<link>http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/111?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction or background</st>
<p>Heavy exercise induces marked immunodepression, which is multifactorial in origin. Evidence showing clinical significance of this immunodepression is scarce.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Sources of data</st>
<p>We assessed in a systematic manner whether physical activity or intensity of exercise increase susceptibility to upper respiratory tract infections (URTI). A literature search was performed using the keywords &lsquo;upper respiratory tract infections&rsquo;, &lsquo;athletes&rsquo;, &lsquo;exercise&rsquo; and &lsquo;physical activity&rsquo;. We considered all studies reporting of the effect of exercise, physical activity, sport and training on susceptibility to URTI. A total of 162 publications were identified and 30 studies were eligible (4 descriptive, 18 observational and 8 interventional). The 30 studies included 8595 athletes (5471 runners, 2803 swimmers) and 1798 non-athletes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of agreement</st>
<p>Moderate activity may enhance immune function, whereas prolonged, high-intensity exercise temporarily impairs the immune competence. Athletes, when compared with lesser active individuals, experience higher rate of URTI after training and competitions. In non-athletes, increasing physical activity is associated with a decreased risk of URTI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of controversy</st>
<p>The relationship between exercise and URTI is affected by poorly known individual determinants such as genetic factors, fitness, nutritional status or atopy. Elite athletes may have a decreased susceptibility to URTI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Growing points and areas timely for developing research</st>
<p>The dose&ndash;response relationship between immunodepression and risk for URTI during the weeks following heavy exercise. What are the clinically relevant methods to assess exercise-induced immunodepression? Is down-regulation of immunity after intense exercise a protective response to limit inflammation? Is there a role for nutritional or pharmaceutical interventions to reduce risk of URTI?</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moreira, A., Delgado, L., Moreira, P., Haahtela, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bmb/ldp010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does exercise increase the risk of upper respiratory tract infections?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The British Council</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>131</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>111</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/133?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management of unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: a meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/90/1/133?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>The management of unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) is controversial, with a high risk of developing avascular necrosis (AVN). We meta-analysed two areas of concern: reduction of the slip and the timing of treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A search of Medline, CINAHL and Embase identified only retrospectively relevant studies: four regarding the role of reduction and five regarding the timing of treatment. The incidence of AVN was compared between reduced and unreduced SUFEs, and between those treated within 24 h of symptom onset and those treated thereafter.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of agreement</st>
<p>Analysis of the pooled data gave an odds ratio of 2.20 (<I>P</I> = 0.290) in favour of the unreduced group, who had a lower risk of developing AVN. The odds ratio was 0.50 in favour of the group treated within 24 h from symptom onset (<I>P</I> = 0.441). However, though clinically important, these effects were not statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas of controversy</st>
<p>The timing of treatment is somewhat inconsistent: two studies favour management more than 24 h after the onset of symptoms, while for three unstable SUFEs are best managed within 24 h.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Growing points</st>
<p>Despite the non-significant results from the meta-analysis, it can be suggested that, if reduction is to be performed, it should be undertaken cautiously, as it may be associated with increased AVN. The ideal time for management of unstable slip is probably within 24 h of symptom onset.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Areas timely for developing research</st>
<p>There is a strong need for multicentre, randomized, controlled trials in this area.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lowndes, S., Khanna, A., Emery, D., Sim, J., Maffulli, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Sports Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bmb/ldp012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management of unstable slipped upper femoral epiphysis: a meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The British Council</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>146</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>133</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>